Search results

The more I think about it, the more happy I will be to see the back of David McGodlrick! He's been holding us back.

4th? Bring on the old 5!!

McEllirick, McEllirick, McEllirick!!

Fook me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 3-2!

Now known as McEllirick!

2-2. Elliot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yes of course, cos as I quite clearly said, every single goal we score is as a result of DMC's good work.

Who the fook needs David McGoldrick?

Mousssaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa :D 1-1

Yep. Powell 15th minute.

Is everyone at the game? Very quiet since we went 1-0 down.

Need to stay firm here.

Bugger!! !

Yes indeed. Makes me a lot more optimistic. Had this one down as a defeat. Now thinking draw. With DMC would have been thinking win! :D

Again, no-one has said they aren't good enough to score a goal. On previous occasions though Elliot, McDonald and ROD have had chances and not come up with the goods. DMC came in and has been scoring for fun. Happy to give all players a chance. Bet MK are mightily relieved though that...

No-one is saying we are a one man team though. You take the league's top goalscorer out though then that creates a problem.

You're misreading me. I am not saying we have no other players scoring goals, I am saying we have no other goalscorer! This season, after the way things have panned out, Baker could be labelled a goalscorer. We are getting goals from elsewhere, but a 'goalscorer' is someone you expect a lot of...

I am not suggesting that though. What I said was 'We are getting goals elsewhere on a lot of occasions due to DMC scoring so many.' On a lot of occasions. Not all goals.He has been a factor for us having space on a lot of occasions. Don't understand the 'the way I am suggesting' comment...

Did he have a mop of hair and go by the name of Tim?

I take it you have not seen the goals then? Schoolboy defending doesn't even begin to describe it.