Search results

I’m getting angry that some don’t want him to have time or transfer money

He might well do. But that wasn’t the reason Robins was sacked

Why have you spent the last bloody hour arguing with me and then come out with this?

We’d have lost today with Collins in goal

Dovin

Robins was allowed to bring in a whole new team. The shower of shite he inherited wouldn’t have achieved what he did

Ok well if no one wants him gone then you have nothing to worry about. You, me, this whole forum are 100% behind Lampard then. Give him the money to improve the team and in the meantime, trust him

How do you expect him to improve a team without money?

So owners like Blackburn and Sheffield Wednesday have?

So do you think we should get rid of Lampard?

If you think no one wants Lampard gone then you haven’t looked at this forum in much detail. Also if you can’t see the relevance of pointing out that Robins had a slow start, and had to build his own team, then you must be some sort of vegetable

Going for a name after we sacked Robins is not the same as sacking him for a name. If you don’t want to go back to 2009, support Lampard and give him a chance. That’s my point

To support our manager and argue that he should be allowed to bring in his own players to improve the team. What’s your objective?

So let’s get this straight. You think Robins was sacked specifically to bring in Lampard? And his sacking had nothing to do with with results?

Facts don’t give a shit about your feelings

Robins wasn’t sacked to bring in a name

Can you give an example of such an owner?

My argument is that managers need time. What’s yours?

I really don’t understand the point you’re making. You’re saying that Lampard should get better results than Robins because we’re playing weaker teams. Well he HAS got better results. I can’t comprehend what you’re trying to argue

And we all know that Lampard has been brought in to lead a play off challenge next season. Or were you expecting him to get us promoted this year??