Search results

Don't forget we were still looking at other players regardless of McNulty staying or going. It's not like the fee received has to cover all remaining business (although suspect it will).

Robins has said it will be reinvested in the team. Unless people think Robins is a liar (and he was honest about not getting Maddison money) then I don't see what people are worried about. We also need to remember that transfer fees are not the only way to spend extra money on players.

I think sometimes you have to trust the managers judgement whoever he brings in. I'm sure he wouldn't have sanctioned the McNulty sale if he wasn't confident he could replace him. His job rides on him making the right signing at the end of the day.

For me it's risk Vs reward. Whatever his innocence or guilt in the matter it will bring a mini media circus and I don't think his talent as a footballer (since coming back at least) outweighs the bad that the signing could do. Certainly not what I'd want to replace McNulty.

It won't be him but he still looked good when he came on against us in the cup. His touch is top class. Would be a real asset still at this level but clearly not a McNulty replacement.

Obviously they've done a lot wrong but just blaming them for everything is just stupid.

How do you know that?

Bayliss! Ask Bayliss!

People are desperate for Sisu to be the pantomime villains despite the fact they played zero part in this transfer.

Sounds like we're not bothered.

I sincerely hope not.

They've only just signed Oztumer.

Not sure Reading would be my choice if I were a footballer (I think they are league one bound) but if he thinks it's the right move for him and his family then good luck to him.

You have to take his age into account. You are buying the potential with someone like Chaplin. As long as it's accompanied by a more proven striker it would be a great move.

You were digging for it.

Cringe

Huh?

Depends which way it went!

Jimmy

Only happened in that one because of a massive deflection.