Search results

🎶 Godden-ly knows what I'd be without you

I believe it's know in the biz as the 'reverse Dabo' Not opposed to playing Hamer at RWB if we absolutely need to, but generally speaking you should play your best players in their best positions, so I think we're better off trying Pask, Burroughs or Rowe in this case.

Looks like the numbers are set if today's squad is anything to go by (they usually say they're using generic numbers, but not today) Ostigard - 2 O'Hare - 11 Hilssner - 17 Giles - 18 Walker - 19 Hamer - 38

One from the archives (2017): Stevenage boss delighted with strike pairing of Walker and Godden Me too, mate!

Sell-on clause or not, it's a rare miss for us on the recruitment front to let a player walk for free and then see him get sold for seven figures less than a year and a half later.

Good lord, that away kit is truly heinous. Hope we barely wear it like last season's.

Sounds like he's very highly rated and will start over McFadzean. If so, this is the first signing of the summer that objectively improves on last year's starting XI (still TBD on Hamer vs Walsh)

I guess they had the patience to see the deal through

Roland Nilsson. All day.

Squad numbers mean less and less every year, but I love over-analysing them. Think it's kind of strange how we've had some extremely sought-after numbers (7, 9, 10, 11) taken up by very peripheral players recently

Our first starting XI is going to be exactly the same as last year, except our best player has been replaced by someone we've never seen play before, and three of our starting back 5 won't be playing either. None of our signings improve on what we had last year. I think we'll figure it out this...

Because the player in question responded. That is literally the only reason. And is also why players don't rise to 99.9% of the shit that's said about them, whether online or in person. So weird how many people don't seem to get this.

Yeah, I don't get the big deal over the CT article. There's no story at all if Jones doesn't rise to it - that's why we're all posting about it in the first place after all. In the same way that it's not a story that someone at a game shouted abuse at Eric Dier, but it is if he responds by...

Weren't all the flag votes pinned to the top of this forum? Must have persuaded a few people it was worth parting with their cash.

If you don't choose to add them then you are denying the club extra funds to sign Liam Walsh and you are probably not a real fan. That's why my custom shirt last season was covered in 30 different SkyBet patches.

Are you not worried we left money on the table by ignoring The Weinstein Company offer?

Alcohol and tobacco ads used to be fine, now they're not. The world's probably a better place for it. Betting ads will probably go the same way some day soon and it won't leave too many people upset. This debate will all seem quite strange.

I've shared enough strikers with you, Mark. We're in the big league now.

U ok hon?

I don't get why playing in a league sponsored by a betting company (which we can't control) means that it's pointless for us to complain about our shirts being sponsored by the same (which we can control)