Search results

Yep, would ACL have let them carry on playing on there indefinitely without paying rent?

That's where the argument would lie in the JR ruling i would think, were they offered a loan at "commercial" rates? If so, was the loan from CCC to ACL at "non-commercial" rates? That would be the crux of any Stae-aid arguments I'd have thought. Did say on aother thread that I think that...

He pretty much kept us up during his three years with us, fair play to him whatever he does in the future.

If the club continued not to pay rent would ACL have let them stay?

Was all for Team Lester beforehand, really thought he'd blossomed and come out of his shell. Now just think he's a right snivelling c**t. Really thought that his missus was going to get it during the car ride whilst she was telling her "Cinderella" story, just thought a bullet would come...

Didn't ACL mind them not paying rent then at the Ricoh? Could have saved a lot of trouble and court cases if they'd just said that at the outset.

Wouldn't have thought it would have anything to do with YB really. Though the fact that the Council QC said that YB were willing to loan money to ACL at the time rather damages the CCC case that they had to loan ACL the money to "protect their asset".

He not going then?

Personally don't/didn't believe a word from any of them, but the hypocrisy is from those who who seem to think that Ranson is some sort of innocent, football and business genius sadly misled by evil Sisu.

He also said that Wood and Hussey, "would be as good as, if not better than Fox and Dann".

There's no evidence at all, and he "resigned" about two years after these supposed deals were to have happened.

Flashback!

To be fair he knows that profits were down on doubled turnover so ACL probably didn't do that well out of it.

Not that year they didn't.

There's always a breakdown on one side or the other on here!

Do you think that ACL would have let the club play at the Ricoh without paying rent at all then indefinitely? In which case there has been no need for any court action by ACL sinc e the start of the rent dispute has there?

If YB, and possibly others if they'd bothered to shop around, were willing to lend ACL the money on new terms during the time that there was a rent dispute with the club and ACL had already initiated court action to recover the debt, then the argument that CCC had to lend the money to ACL is a...

So Ranson claims, however he also claimed we were debt free, almost as eye-watering as the interest he claimed from the club for his "loan". He brought Sisu to the club, he spunked a load of money getting us nowhere, loaned Championship rivals money to buy players from his own Cayman based...

I'd have thought it would be looked at that if there were commercial lenders willing to lend at commercial rates then there should have been no requirement for CCC to make a loan to ACL, unless of course it was at a "non-commercial" rate, which could then be classed as State Aid I'd have...

My very same thought.