Search results

How long have you been a subscriber to The Times?

No doubt. But with 12 managers in the last 10 years, and 14 points below us in the table, I'm not sure he would see it as a better career prospect.

This is just the laziest, most patronizing bollocks. They could have just come out and said "We want more shows with posh old white people"

Like almost every player and manager, he'd surely go if he was offered a big jump in salary and better career prospects. That's what he did last time, and he'd do it again if Forest could offer those (which they can't).

Do you not think we’d be approaching games differently if that was our mindset? When safety was our main goal last season we were set up quite conservatively in games where our main priority was not to lose (Birmingham and Wycombe at home etc). Worked great for us then, but they’d feel like huge...

I understand why MR is publicly managing expectations, but I think we will be setting our sights on a lot more than 50 points. Forest are 14 points behind us, Derby will soon be 17 points behind us. The odds of us being relegated are tiny. If nothing else, it’s much more fun to be focused on...

Quelle surprise, she doesn’t mention a “new stadium” in that clip at all, she only talks about needing to have our “own stadium”.

Anyone else no longer thinking about safety?

When you have a limited budget, you need players like Hyam to step up and do a job for you. It’s all well and good saying we should upgrade on him, but a capable replacement at this level will cost a lot more than Hyam. The fact that he’s doing a more than capable job allows us to strengthen...

So if ‘vaccine passports’ also have a fixed end date, it’s no longer a slippery slope? Just trying to understand the rigid ideological opposition to something we’ve already decided makes sense elsewhere.

I’m sorry, I genuinely can’t understand what you’ve written here (changing what status?) If the government can legally imprison me for 10 days regardless of my health status, and won’t let me out until I prove I likely don’t have Covid, isn’t the vaccine passport question already settled in...

??? The quarantine rules have got progressively more restrictive, including forcing people to stay in government-approved hotels rather than their own homes. But no slippery slope there I take it? And again - presumably you think people should be allowed out of quarantine once they produce the...

So why isn’t forcibly keeping people in their homes irrespective of whether they have the virus a slippery slope? I assume you think they should be allowed out to live freely once they produce the proper paperwork to show they likely don’t have Covid?

So you don’t agree with British citizens having to quarantine once they enter the country then?

Wow, the most committed they have ever been, you say? Have they done two drawings this time?

Look we all know that Warwick University wouldn't have signed onto the new stadium press release if it wasn't definitely going to happen, this stadium project is the one, I can feel it.

It also shows that regardless of whether you're a conspiracy-spouting lunatic, not taking vaccines (or undermining them if you're in a position of authority) because you're worried about extremely rare or non-existent side effects can lead to thousands of unnecessary deaths.

Good article on why Japan has a problem with vaccine skepticism here: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/12/23/national/japan-vaccine-history-coronavirus/

Hard to say I'm against something that already exists in various forms, before COVID-19 even existed. I'm not jonesing for a society-wide scheme (the system in Abu Dhabi, for example, goes too far for me) but in principle, I don't see a problem with temporarily restricting certain high-risk...

The social media 'team' is a pretty amateur operation. More spelling mistakes than GB News and has somehow still not worked out how to post a working link on Instagram.