Search results

Not with Sisu, no way.

~HEY MAN! THAT's TOTALLY Football related!! This is an accountancy forum. :guitar2::guitar2::guitar2::guitar2:

"Subject to the consent of FL" That's another ray of sunshine

It would be stupid to make any statement while the Admistrator is at work. He only came out recently and said that any statements were not helping anyone and criticised Fisher for "purporting" to run club. The only thing that's "deluded" is the original poster.

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Not-One-Penny-More/468571966556656 Every little helps.:blue:

There is ONE huge difference however. We are all better informed.

That's Binley/Brandon/Wolston/bretford area! No fucking way. Move a cow shed round there and you're satan's daughter ffs!

OSB, I salute you.

But Only with us, despite the depressed economy gates overall are slightly UP!

If this happened I could genuinely frsee the time when another club play their football at the RICOH. This wouldn't necessarily be a phoenix club started by a Haskell but could be a club like Nuneaton moving in to inhabit the vacuum left by CCFC, r.i.p.! :o

But the Administrator used the word "purport" He means that he runs the club and is asking for Fisher to shut up. Surely by threatening to take the club out of Cov he is threatening to further reduce income and isn't the remit of the administrator to secure the best policy for the business...

Reading between the lines I'd say the Administrator is clearly saying that the club and holdings are one and the same. The key word is "purporting". This cannot be underestimated imo. He obviosly takes a dim view of Fisher trying to suggest they are different entities.

That must be the logical interpretation. It also sounds as though the Administrator has got the measure of SISU; their lying, cheating, their miserable posturing and manipulation of the facts. They have previous too, acknowledged in a court of law. If mud sticks......:wave::o

Care to expand on your reasoned argument?

:facepalm::facepalm: You haven't understood, have you?

Yes, I see the irony, but not in the context of a sense of "renewed unity" as a direct response to the move to move away from Coventry. The spoilers then return creating new polemic. Tired of it.

A great deal of "hate" there. Have you considered an anger management course?

My point exactly. Trouble is there are those that are worried that Sisu may lose the war. Can anyone think why? Their tactic is "Divide and rule" we have to stick together and boycott sisu in order to force change for the benefit of the club long term. This is a simple choice and well understood...

Oh dear! I think we've understood this for a very long time. Time to entertain a paradigm shift, this will involve change, btw. ;)

Rubbish. You're just accusing others of what you're guilty of. There's one key difference though; the proof as in EVIDENCE of where the club is and where it is going is heavily stacked against sisu. They, after all, are the club's owners and the buck stops there.