Search results

100% this. Thomas alongside a genuine experienced leader at the back would be a formidable pairing. Thomas and Kitching is sometimes great, and sometimes very much not great. Thomas is the one with the potential to get better.

Also an enabler for my boss to contact me at all hours of the day, including outside my billable time. How much does that save him?

Is the way we played against Sunderland an accurate reflection of our system? Or is it just the way Sunderland forced us to play?

Lampard at least has players he trusts in midfield, which can’t be said at ST. So beyond the obvious holes at LB and GK, you’d imagine strikers would be the priority.

Those are the rules - it’s not up to the referee to ignore them just because there’s a chance a player might get injured in some hypothetical incident that follows. I would say the obvious scandal here is a player suffering an injury that ultimately requires hospital treatment staying on the...

Emotions are pretty raw but his performances over the past two years have generally been good. You don’t want to sell someone with his track record without being able to maximise your profits in the process, so I wouldn’t look to sell him unless there’s someone very keen to buy.

I don’t mind keeping him purely for squad depth, but no other team in the division would have him as a number 2.

There is an obvious player welfare issue here but it has nothing to do with VAR.

It will quite obviously be Grimes next season and I think that’s fine?

Realistically if we want to make a go of things next year then the GK we bring in has to be good enough to play all season. Dovin is a solid prospect, but is young and coming off a serious injury - if he’s your immediate/obvious first choice come January then it does not imply the team is in a...

Anyone who seriously believed Hamer had any intention of staying should expect a knock on the door from the wallet inspector sometime soon.

I haven’t watched this video, but that’s a disgusting answer from the ungrateful rat boy and he should be ashamed.

You stand by another country “making the economic viability of the UK untenable” because it’s Labour “getting what they deserve”? And you have the gall to ask British people to vote for you?

Here you go:

So what’s your actual argument here? Starmer can’t engage with any post-Brexit political realities as Prime Minister because he voted Remain nine years ago?

I thought that was Newcastle?

In fairness to The Philosopher, he openly admits he’s a Trump fan who would celebrate if the “economic viability of the UK [became] untenable” via tariffs so long as it served Starmer right. Somehow he’s confused how this doesn’t translate to a successful election strategy for him personally...

You also moaned here about somehow not being “entitled to your opinion”. Trust me when I say that no-one has any expectation that you’re going to be silent anytime soon.

So you think Starmer should have held off on repairing trade relations with our largest single trading partner until he’d successfully re-admitted us into the EU? In the name of not being “duplicitous”?