Search results

The administrator need to check all documentation before he is satisfied who owns the golden share. It is not enough for him that somebody says they own it - he want proof. Internal documents of the hand over. External documents communicating the transfer to the PL and PA. And it actually takes...

A few months ago when the Trust first said their goal was to make sure the fans got shares and representation on the board I said that would eventually make the Trust hostages as they would be part of decisions not all fans would applaud. Well, this thread is the first taste of just that...

Maybe - how cheap is decided by the main creditor ARVO - who is more or less controlled by sisu. Maybe sisu tops any bid they deem too low and regain full ownership.

Isn't that what people are complaining?

I thought people wants owners who loves the club and want real estate development?

I don't think the trust claim to represent ALL supporters - only the members.

I didn't say that - did I? I said The answers will become public knowledge at some point in time - just not right now.

There's No Doubt About IT .... http://hca.gilead.org.il/no_doubt.html

I had to Google that. 'The Stadium was originally owned jointly by Stoke City F.C., Stoke-on-Trent City Council and Stoke-on-Trent Regeneration Ltd. However, in December 2007 Stoke City F.C. announced that they had agreed a deal to buy the shares in the stadium of Stoke-on-Trent City Council...

The Trust are not journalists - they are a body trying to work with the club. The Trust tries to be the supporters voice. If the club gives them information - that is openness and transparancy. What we all want. If the club says: Here are answers to the questions you have asked, but please do...

Because a charity owns half of ACL?

No. http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/11316-FAQ-2-Money-Talks

It's the secret pages of this forum. I have linked to the FAQ's at least 10 times the past few days to help out people get some facts on loans, debts, strategy etc.

http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/coventry-city-fc/coventry-city-fc-news/2013/03/26/half-stake-in-ricoh-arena-on-sale-for-4m-92746-33061348/ I think Higgs paid about £6m. The 'secret formular' that was put in place to calculate a buy out is reported to be around £8m-£10m.

It could be acceptable business to buy the Higgs shares for £4mio - if indeed that price tag is real and not just made up by a journalist.

Yes, it is so easy to lose the perspective in this mess of facts, half-facts and made-up's.

http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threads/11316-FAQ-2-Money-Talks

So - after you have digested all the figures in this thread can I quietly ask once more: What if ACL ... ... were owned solely by CCC? What if a charity had never been involved? Would it had made any difference to the negotiations? Would there ever have been a rent strike? Would we...

... were owned solely by CCC? What if a charity had never been involved? Would it had made any difference to the negotiations? Would there ever have been a rent strike? Would we the fans have demanded the city to sell ACL to the club at the prize of the mortgage? Would this have ever gone to...

It is interesting as this may open the possibility of Higgs selling their shares to another party. But will another party buy the shares at the calculated formel? Maybe the consortium of local businesses ... 'Down the Pipes' or whatever it's called. Maybe ccc should buy the Higgs shares?