Search results

Allan Green? (But he played more than just 1 game for us?)

Peter Thomas?

Maybe a combination? A ban till he has apologized.

Actually I believe it was some sort of pay-back. Didn't Ms Seppala say she was happy to meet and discuss a new deal at the Ricoh WHEN ACL had signed the CVA? Just goes to show how childish all parties are behaving. It's a f*king kindergarden ... PWKH even brought balloons.

Didn't Mr Appelton indicate that the offer was tied to the CVA?

... and Dulieu!

You can have one from a lot other here. Seems they have duplicates to spare.

Don't worry, Fisher will leave when sisu becomes unhappy with his performance and results. Same goes for ACL management. They will leave when CCc/Higgs Charity becomes unhappy with their performance and results. Who do you think will leave first? It's been a while we had a poll ...

If he hasn't lied then I am not so sure if sisu find him incompetent.

Maybe they are waiting to see if the JR will go further? Maybe they are waiting to see what happens in CCc - if somehow there will be an invitation to talk about reuniting club and stadium. Again that will probably not happen before Limited is liquidated and all the court cases have found...

Stay on topic please ... this is no evidence that Fisher has lied. Do you even read replys? FL are not concerned about company laws. And if FL have registered the players as belonging to Holdings since relegation from PL, then how can they see it as a sisu plan? I can't see how we can be...

ACL only accepted Limited as the club and subsequently would only talk to Appelton. That is reported widely, and not a 'Fisher lie'. Moving to Northampton is part of the plan to be released from the Ricoh lease. That has not been said by the club or Fisher, but I think we can all see that was...

But which company are you talking about? Otium? Can they file accounts while SBS&L haven't? Can SBS&L file accounts when Holdings haven't? Can Holdings file accounts when Limited is still under liquidation? Maybe it's possible, but would it be practical? And btw - even if the accounts are...

I agree - that seem to be the plan (as I have said many times). You can include the 'wall of debts' they put up too. It all leads to the conclusion this is a well planned and well executed strategy with the goal of freeing the club from the Ricoh lease. 'Should have' ... well, surely you can't...

Yes, I agree. Next week we should all be a lot wiser. As this administration process has caught some widespread attention I cannot see Appelton doing a 'sloppy' or 'inacurate' job. You could argue both the club and the FL are equally to blame. It will be interesting to see how far back ccfc...

If players were transfered with the intend to defraud creditors it will be in Appeltons report next week. That would also be Fishers last day in office if it happened under his management. But with all the legal aids at his disposal I wouldn't put any money on that.

Of course the players could be listed in Holdings by FL even if FL gave the GS to Limited. It's an error, and FL have accepted the error was made by them. Players may NOT have been transferred from Limited to Holdings as OSB explained yesterday. I don't think everybody knows what has...

That would be illegal. Yes. FL have since relegation from PL registered our players in Holdings. The Golden Share was registered in Limited. FL explained they considered Holdings and Limited combined as the club. Totally ridiculous explanation, but blame the FL for that. Appelton is only...

Can you see a reason for holding back the accounts till after Appelton has finished his job?

Yes - certainly. But as OSB explained yesterday, all the players could actually be in Limited the date the last accounts were signed off. Subsequently new players and new contracts could then be listed in Holdings. All legal, but surely a well planned and executed strategy to escape the Ricoh...