Search results

Yeah, the last three have been given long enough. You're a clownshoe.

https://twitter.com/SkySportsMobile/status/255416749917339648 I imagine some here will get some pleasure out of that after his comments the other day.

Hardly the kind of unique selling point to inspire a name though.

It's a little extra conditioning; you mess up, you lose out. Even if it's inconsequential it helps to hopefully establish a more disciplined mindset.

Why's it called Farmfoods anyway, it's all freezers isn't it? Could be an Nordic farm.

Only around 20 games in but I'm topping the division helped by new left back Punch Masanamela (or something) and PSG outcast Jean-Eudes Maurice. Also helping, the FORCES FROM BEYOND THE CRYPT: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-0tR3ryKhQ

Robins does refer to John Fleck as 'Flecky' which was a little disappointing. If only because footballer nicknames are the drizzling shits in general.

Billy Daniels seems the most obvious pick as he's already been thrown in with the first team this season.

psgm1 seems to manage fine, you have to almost admire such commitment to a stance.

Ignoring that that's not the exact opposite at all, McGoldrick picked up a ball out wide in a move that resulted in the only goal of the game yesterday.

Nobody's seriously this dense are they?

You are correct sir! Although the shirt mixup did carry on into the second half:

I heard that there's some kind of ruling that the team you put out can only have a small number of changes from the league game that precedes it, so we really have no choice but to go for it thankfully, as you'd want that core team to get in the habit of winning. I'd kill for any kind of...

Agreed with Otis. We're obviously a work in progress, but the fact that he made a change at half-time after spotting our deficiencies in the first half that eventually led to a win is a very promising sign in the new manager.

The worry from our side is that good performances could alert other teams who could swoop and nab him in January quite easily if his Forest situation is as reported.

A player can come on and be man of the match, of course they can. Particularly if nothing of consequence happens in the first half like today. Otherwise McGoldrick can't be man of the match as he didn't play the entire match either. If there was an award of man of 88 minutes - maybe!!!!!

Yes he was!! Note I used two exclamation points which makes my retort one better.

psgm1 seems to whinge more than average, which is really saying a lot on this site.

I didn't see anything in Ball at all in his first few games but since his goal he's started coming good. I can see him starting more games at this rate. Nail on head stuff here:

He worked extremely hard on the right side and was one of the few players who looked capable of retaining possession at times.