Search results

Stick with 3-4-1-2, play Lati in a back 3. I’ve never been his biggest fan since he signed but it’s obvious he was signed as a CB for a back 3 and he looked solid against Preston. From the interview it seems like he’s got his head screwed on and that’s what we need. Keep 2 up front, maybe...

It’s fucking shit but in all honesty I never expected a result here. We never beat these pricks. I was however hoping for a slightly better performance, but next game is the real test.

The final ball has been wank every time

fucking hate Preston

Might be seeing Tatsu as wing back second half.. MVE not got going

Shittest team on the planet are Preston.

I was saying I wanted to see us try 3-4-1-2 again now we’ve got some different players, and it looks like he’s done it. Will be interesting.

Our 4-2-3-1 is more often than not a 4-3-3 in various points over a game. Not entirely sure what triggers it tbf, because it's not a straight in and out of possession thing, at least not the last few games anyway.

Can see a similar lineup to last game to be honest. As I've said before, I'd personally like us to give a 3-4-1-2 a go but I doubt it'll happen. Can see a 4-2-3-1: Dovin Lati Thomas Kitching Bidwell Eccles Sheaf Rudoni BTA/Simms EMC MVE Ordinarily I'd say Lati wouldn't play or at least...

God almighty the international break can't end soon enough. We're shitting the bed over a bloke sharing a rumour he heard. Some of you lot take this way too seriously

Watch us still lose 3-0 since it's fucking Preston

This is what I would go with. I think 3-4-1-2 could work well for us with the energy we have in Asante, Basette and Rudoni. I always felt that without Vik, and Wright and Simms up front we had absolutely zero energy in that 3-4-1-2 we used to play. And now I think with Torp and how much...

Rudoni isn't exactly a 10 himself really. Plays somewhere in between an 8 and a 10. Not saying Torp is an out and out 10 but his strengths are much more suited to being higher up the pitch in front of the holding mids. He wouldn't be one that drops deep to grab the ball like Rudoni, but...

I don't understand this argument. Torp isn't remotely similar to Sheaf in any aspect. We've been playing him deep in a Sheaf role out of necessity, that's not where his strengths are at all. Play him further up where Rudoni plays and we'll see the best of him. He's got a lovely eye for a pass...

If we’re going 2 up front like some are suggesting, it has to be a back 3 in my opinion. I just can’t see the players we have fitting into any formation with 2 up front and a back 4. 3-4-1-2 lets us play Kitching, Thomas, Binks / Lati, Dasilva and MVE as wing backs with Bidders and Tatsu as...

I agree that Dennis and Adi leaving isn't the route cause of our issues, but I think it is compounding to them a little. Since Dennis left it was quite clear our defensive shape was poorer, and we started leaking goals. Adi was a players favourite (some aside if rumours are to be believed) and...

It's a tough one. I feel most of our signings have been 'potential' signings or 'work in progress'. I see the potential in Thomas, Binks, Simms, Torp, Basette and the likes, but the problem is until they fulfil their potential, they're what we have now. Shit hot or shit. We needed...

I think this is a key issue. The most experienced players we have at the club currently are Wilson, Allen and Sheaf. Wilson and Allen couldn't guide a man into a woman let alone a training session, no disrespect to either, that's just not their personalities or how they are. If you look back...

Whether going back to wing backs is the answer or not, I think it’s pretty clear that the 4-2-3-1 / 4-3-3 we’re persisting with isn’t working. I honestly think we’d be better off going 2 up front. 3-4-1-2 I think would suit us. Binks and Lati were bought to be in a back 3, we have MVE...

Torp isn’t a holding / defensive mid. Neither is Lati tbf but Torp is much better when he’s able to roam further up.