Search results

This would be the loan that shored up ACL's cashflow and enabled them to make a reduced offer to SISU and thus actually should have helped 'keep them in coventry'......

This is very much a similar situation as a lot of residential properties. When you buy a house you may well own the leasehold of the property which gives you the rights to the property itself, whereas you will not own the freehold to the site which gives rights to the land and everything on it...

SISU the champion of providing information to the fans..... Pfffft!

This is a difficult subject because I personally think that ACL did the right thing in rejecting the CVA. They did not agree with the administration process, which I think most of us will agree was not performed correctly, and therefore were obliged to reject the CVA in their own best interests...

It's about making a statement which is what NOPM has been about all along. The owners would be made to look idiots if 'home' matches have been 2,000 ish all season, and as soon as we are 'away' at Sixfields, we pack the place. The gate money is the sacrifice and quite frankly would make...

Joy Sepalla names and shamed in coverage. Respect to the commentator as well describing the situation as 'ridiculous'.

It is a wierd situation to be in. I definately want Coventry to win but there is that niggle at the back of my mind that says 'We've won - I really hope that doesn't draw more fans to sixfields'. It is more of a bittersweet feeling than anything else. The opposite situation is also true that if...

Well that's for the inactive members to rectify not the board. That's a huge accusation. Are you actually going to prove it?

Not that I condone the pitch invasion but if the match is abandoned before a certain time, don't they have to give a full refund on the tickets.....?

Proof that the company could fund the clubs losses while groundsharing is based upon Fishers projections of 3,000 - 7,000 spectators every match. If the actual figures are regularly below that it will call into question the whole basis of the funding assumptions.

The post it is specifically aimed at London based Coventry fans. ie those that can easily make protests at SISU and Football League offices.

The problem then is that the protest loses some of it's effect. It is far more telling that the fans will continue to support the team at grounds across the country but will then refuse to attend at Northampton. It shows a structured approach to the protest that is more than just merely...

A good run will actually be very important to the NOPM campaign in terms of stark reality for Fisher. He is relying on good results bringing the fans back. If the run continues and the crowds continue to be under 2,000 (inc away) then the plans SISU made will be in trouble. The quotes...

We are still playing in Northampton and we still have some of the worst owners the game has seen. Be strong people! This is about having a club to be proud of and to be able take your children and your grandchildren to watch for years to come. Look beyond one or two seasons. NOT ONE...

The club is riddled with the cancer that is SISU. It will not be the club I know and love until that cancer is removed. The removal will be tough but it will be for the good of the club in the long term.

Whelan!!!!!!!

I thought the whole point was that were obilged to provide travel free of charge as part of the groundshare agreement, or did I imagine this?

The main idea behind NOPM was the direct purchase of tickets and merchandise. So no home matches and shirts basically. This is what drives the message home. Buster is right, we were never going to be 100%, but the hit and the message that SISU will get is going to be very significant. And...

Ricoh with two others.

In that case the group parent company would be liable surely....