Search results

And who do you see as the PLP winning? The membership have the final say on the leader. Whoever wins it’s the memberships choice.

It’s just factional bollocks. Ian Lavery was thinking about running FFS, then once polling shows Starmer wiping the floor with RLB he thinks the men should step down. Dickhead.

Thornberry has actually started better than I expected. Thought this was interesting: WATCH: Focus group rejects Labour leadership frontrunners - LabourList Starmer has been coasting, I’d like to see more from him. RLB is as useless as I thought she’d be.

The vegans of CCFC fans.

Rather than assuming, let them show that to be the case if it is.

This looks promising, just needs server space: DemocracyOS - Change the Tool Would need some form of payment gateway and subscription management service as well as continued subscriptions is a good idea. Will go a-googling

Early optimism is fading now. Reality of playing a team a division ahead setting in. Still magic of FA Cup and all that.

@Sky Blue Pete check your PMs. Some good news on this.

Let’s scope what we are asking for. The main one seems to be an online voting system. @Nick this is more your forte, what do you reckon it’d take in terms of infrastructure and setup? Would need to be secure obviously and not require too much technical maintenance so it could be run by...

I do! Just bored at work

9 left

Because political ideology (and dress sense) is a choice and therefore fair game whereas sex, race and sexuality aren’t. Happy to help.

Yeah maybe that’s the right agenda to go in with rather than straight into the politics? Open up meetings and voting first. Wonder if it could be done with getting a resolution passed rather than the whole board member stuff.

Join the Trust

Yeah I’ve seen 8-10k seats for segregation bandied around.

I seem to recall doing this when Coleman was here and coming up pretty much even overall. And he was “well backed”.

Ah OK. I’ll go back to lurking.

I think you should check it against what’s known. From what I’ve seen it seems as good as any other source. There’s always some issues with opaque data like that. What do they do for undisclosed fees that aren’t confirmed? Do they guess? (Goes to check) edit: checked Maddison which I don’t...

Again, you can’t compare two datasets. It could be that they realised the AVM was miles off (they often are) and stopped updating it. We literally did the same thing on my site.