Search results

It's not a backtrack really. What he's saying is if acl suddenly want to sell then they'd listen...

This is what sisu wanted though, to put acl in a position where they could not accept the terms of the Cva, only other option given was to liquidate, and then have acl look bad so they can point the finger. Thus is exactly what fisher has done since.

That's pretty much all that comes out of fishers mouth, same old bollocks. A few fans need to wake up and smell the coffee. Saying that, fisher could pour out a cup of sewage, say its gourmet coffee, and some fans would believe him and drink it.

Proves that tim fisher is a liar, hates coventry, the Ricoh and everyone associated with it, including us fans?

Only issue I can see with this legal action is that according to the press release at the time NTFC did a deal with Otium, who were only preferred buyers at that stage, potential new owners. The ntfc deal effectively was set in stone once the FL gave them the golden share and approved the...

He does not want to be at the Ricoh. Simple. Also he never says why acl did not 'recognise' them....this was only since they were in admin, the lease was with CCFC ltd, the administrator ran that. Why would they not deal with you tim before this?...

He's got a nerve shaking fans hands. To be honest those who shook his hand need their heads looking at. What did they say to him? "We'll done tim, you've got us on the right path and in the right direction"....ffs

Why is he getting all this airtime? Bloke is a grade a scumbag.

Can't believe some still want a 'new' stadium. We've already got a new stadium. Just the idiots who run the club don't want to negotiate.

At sixfields, it still doesn't make it right and we shouldn't be there...

A lot of coventry people and coventry fans work for acl. It was sisu who put us in admin and have moved us to Northampton. Be careful who you call filth....

Acl were put in an impossible position, sign to sisu's terms or else. This has made acl look bad (fishers tone earlier could not have hid his delight at all) and its what sisu wanted all along liquidation of CCFC ltd

But the Cva was on sisu's terms and they could not accept them. Appleton nor sisu were willing to accept acl's terms, so they had no option.

It's a strange way of going about your business if you would like access to revenues, which means effectively going into partnership with ACL, when all you've done in the past eighteen months is not pay your rent, spout in the media how evil acl are, legal threats against the council and acl...

What may have started off as negotiations over rent was very quickky realised ti be nothing of the sort...ulterior motives. In my opinion Sisu can not and must not ever own ANY share in ACL/The Ricoh Arena. I believe CCFC should but not while Sisu/Otium have anything to do with us.

£300k a year for a stadium such as London rd. Anyone still think £400k a year for a stadium such as the Ricoh is still unreasonable? And none of this 'access to all revenue streams' rubbish, that would equate to about 100k a year profit....so effectively £300k a year to use an Olympic standard...

So basically robins left cos Huddersfield get the money from the pies...

Ah, the non trading property subsidiary that had no assets and that wasn't a football club?

This is something i keep saying to people, these matchday revenues that Fisher keeps harping on about getting access to will not make much difference. They equate to roughly equivalent of 1 maybe 2 League One standard players salaries - hardly the difference between being in the red, perhaps...

its because they were audited when they were still at the higgs.