Search results

Because they didn't agree with it? why agree and sign something you have fundamental issues with. It's like signing divorce papers for adultery when you did no such thing, by signing it you're agreeing to it. Like going to sixfields some say legitimises what has happened.

So acting the way they have is conducive to positive talks with acl over the 50% option? Could have been so different, but they chose to act disgracefully.

F&b ain't the answer and not the real stumbling block. Selling tickets would get more revenue.

That's wrong too, could be playing at Ricoh without sisu owning it....

Then I stand corrected... But you're still wrong about sisu owning the Ricoh.

Sorry I don't follow

i'd take you seriously but that looks like a picture of you outside Sixfields.....

Joy could be stood on the hill at Northampton and no-one would know, as long as she didn't speak

It's as simple as this.....sisu must never own any part of the Ricoh. Ccfc should at some point but not whilst sisu have anything to do with them.

Plans put to football league, or they've told football league they plan to build a new stadium? Plans I assume would be a drawing of some description....neither fans or any council have seen plans for a new stadium, and also the size of site would determine the design/site of stadium. If...

They turn down exhibitions because CCFC were there for a match day, only last season they had to turn down England under 21 games as they clashed. Trust me it happens and CCFC were always the priority.

I'm almost certain relegation to league 1 was part of the plan, but what an absolute disgraceful thing to want the club you own to do, just cos it was part of a ruthless business practice of trying to distress a local company half paid for by fans/citizens of coventry, half a charity....

Had the acl admin gone ahead then yes, last seasons 10 points was down to them. Lets not forget they applied for that as they were owed over £1million unpaid rent. However sisu probably knowing full well they wouldn't get a look in with acl appointed administrator put club in themselves, so...

My point is that why are acl now to be scrutinised because CCFC are no longer there, its not as if they were kicked out.

It's not acl's fault there isn't a football club there at the minute.

Oh and Tim being mystified is only another excuse for him to have another potshot, its already been long established that he's a f-ing liar

If Appleton won't entertain a revised Cva then what's the point? They've given their best offer and it was rejected out of hand. Acl are only people realistically able to do something about the owners...they've tried but so far come up against brick walls. At least they are coventry people....

Indeed, acl have moved more than once, fisher/seppala etc haven't/wont

If we were to believe fisher that the players have been, at least since we went into admin, registered with holdings, then there is only one company that could have moved them based on today's information, and that is the company fisher works for....he would know. Just more lies and trying to...

Interesting about TF refusing to meet sky blue trust (I.e. the fans group) when they didn't help with the move... He spouts on about acl not recognising Otium whilst in admin (which was correct), he isn't recognising the supporters groups. Prat