Players registrations (1 Viewer)

AJB1983

Well-Known Member
If we were to believe fisher that the players have been, at least since we went into admin, registered with holdings, then there is only one company that could have moved them based on today's information, and that is the company fisher works for....he would know.
Just more lies and trying to deflect responsibility again
 

supergonk

New Member
Fisher now needs to disclose which players were registered with which company. Failure to do so makes his previous denial of registrations being held by Ltd seem to be lies. If players were registered with Ltd under his stewardship, then blaming previous administrations is compounding the lies.

If Holdings claim beneficial ownership of the assets of Ltd, they should also have beneficial ownership of the debts. Those assets should be held as guarantees against the debts to ACL, HMRC and the Higgs Centre. But of course, a sisu appointed administrator, who apparently failed to spot the dual-company registration of players, (the best man for the job according to sisu; now we know why) is unlikely to transfer debts as well as assets, the company that appointed him might not like that.

It is time for the FA to insist on restarting the administration process under an administrator appointed by them.
 
Last edited:

sky blue john

Well-Known Member
Most companies use an accounting system like Sage and would show the history for ltd and holdings as separate programs.
This would also show if someone has amended the records and on what date !!!!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top