Search results

Just been posted on gmk, if anyone wants to read it. I won't post a link in case I get threatened with legal action...;-) Just so many questions again....2 main ones.... 1. why did trust and relations break down with acl? (Mmm I wonder) 2. They say they won't deal directly with acl, so why...

Can't believe she is doing this as she's on committee for sky blues in community (ha!) and formers players association, which I'm pretty sure condemns the fact CCFC have moved and would not support a new stadium. This whole idea of a new ground is pathetic.

Talking of fans surveys, they never did publish the one they emailed to us before they moved out of the Ricoh did they?

And isn't ffp what fisher kept going on about? Their lies unravel with the next one they spout. They've realised that the fans know it was never about the rent or revenues, getting personal now and they still think the council should deal with them and sell up? Beyond belief.

No doubt this stadium group will be made up of some of fishers bum chums off the SCG..... A lawyer with good links to community but also effectively on sisu's side for moving club out of the community? Mmm...

And none of the other major sponsors/tenants have pulled out either....

Just google him, it's all public domain stuff. Knows shit about football or coventry

Acl will have been advised of this already....the sisu pr changes week by week...Ann Lucas was the brunt of it not so long ago, not the angle is 'acl are horrible tenants, unprofessional at running the stadium and they bled club dry'...currently this is all fisher and labovitch are pushing...

Disgraceful words. Two main questions: 1. Why would acl actively try to bankrupt and destroy the very tenant the stadium was built for? 2. What has the council taking over the mortgage got to do with driving out the owners?

Thing is there is nothing in the article that is arguable? He's basically stated fact of what has happened in the saga hasn't he? So looking at it sisu don't like the truth/facts being reported by a respected publication, as they would rather have everybody believe the fisher/labovitch version...

Shame these questions weren't put to fisher at the meeting, unless they've been edited out. He cares that much about it that he left early...

I have read them in full, it was nick Connell saying it should have more influence on website. Just Funny how it's the first meeting since the JR decision and the current PR angle from labovitch and fisher is to now say how acl and council have bled the club dry and tried to get them out. It's...

Why have these been published on club website, they aren't normally. Another bullshit propaganda exercise...

Only just read this, what a disgraceful thing for labovitch to say. Anyone who falls for this dogshit propaganda needs their head looking at

Why was it to the detriment of CCFC? Because fisher said so? It secured the future of the Ricoh, CCFC should have been happy about it, but weren't because it meant sisu couldn't get their grubby hands on it for a pittance

Invest in the team? What by borrowing other teams players for a month at a time? They've never invested in the team, that's why we're in league one

Surely as council tax payers, citizens of coventry, and fans of a club that's home ground used to the Ricoh, we and the football club would want to ensure the future and very existence of the arena was secure? Seems only one group think the opposite, we all know 'why' they have taken this legal...

I've moved on. Been once this season (Walsall) having been a regular or ST holder for decades, but the decision to not support the sisu stance and go to Northampton was a difficult decision made easy. For the sake of being principled and not being taken for a complete mug, I can live without...

No but fans in numbers getting behind them may raise their confidence....having said that, it never happened at Ricoh. Our fans boo which clearly helps...

They're fucked then on Saturday