Search results

Ours shouldn’t contain them either. It’s supposed to change as you go through the leagues, but we never changed it back as we dropped down. I wonder who ours would be now? Barnsley or Bournemouth, Swansea or anyone?

Fucking hell my maths is letting my down today, how did I get 22 from 2012-1994?

Clarke-Harris?

Did it come with the pube on?

Peace of mind when they’re walking home from school/to their mums mostly. Let’s me give them more freedom earlier than I would if I didn’t have that peace of mind.

Fair point I didn’t account for pens. We’re still talking one season four years ago.

Walkers NPG/90 was 0.35 last season. Goddens 0.37. Hardly way behind. Over a season Walker would’ve got 16, Waghorn and Godden 17.

Nope. Still missing. The point is the strikers don’t matter if you can’t create chances and you can’t create chances if you have to have ten men behind the ball to stop conceding. Bringing up how many we scored is proving my point. If we had high xG and low goals scored then yes we’d need better...

Even if we signed Osti we’d be the same team that needed 9 defensive players on the pitch to stop leaking goals. I think going forward we have much more talent this season. Maatsen looks better in the final third than McCallum, Sheaf is much more progressive than Kelly, a fit Dabo is a threat...

Missing. People are blathering on about Bakayoko who played 300 minutes all season when the point is our attack was poor because we had to use quantity rather than quality to plug the leaks on the pitch. We had two strikers who if fit were on track to score as many as Waghorn on his best...

Here’s an evidence review of genetic links to COVID, not smart enough to know what it means mind: Genetic susceptibility of COVID-19: a systematic review of current evidence - PubMed

Sorry my man, the non compete clause my girlfriend put it in pretty watertight.

Managing a kids iPhone is a lot easier on an Apple device.

Do you work for free then? Fancy popping round and doing my garden?

Dont start me on “trial shifts”. A half day interview process max. You need longer than that to pick an employee you shouldn’t be in business.

They should be pulled up too. If you tell someone they have to be somewhere for their job you need to pay them. Some of the shit employers get away with is an absolute joke.

“Oh I didn’t know if you ask your workers to turn up to work you have to pay them” Not a great look. Paying people for their labour is kinda step one of being an employer.

ITT people spectacularly missing the point others are making.

He’s not a million miles away by all accounts. Is that the main point here? Address the actual point being made.