Search results

Thanks, it wasn’t there when I got my ST.

Brilliant, thanks. Haven’t seen that option.

Where do you get those from?

It would probably be illegal state aid.

They used a lot of black marker pens on that.

Still no mention in the CT. surely this should be local media gold dust.

And the earlier complaint must have had some success if the tender exercise was repeated.

It does look suspicious when they haven’t asked for it whilst the JRs were underway.

No mention of the interview in the cov telegraph.

It was in the article on SSN Seppala says the deal Wasps wanted for Coventry to remain at the Ricoh Arena was unreasonable, explaining: "We signed an agreement with Wasps that we would not litigate against them over the sale of the Ricoh. We agreed to terms. "But then when they came back, they...

Better still, go to the Wimbledon match that coincides with us against MK Dons away. A sea of sky blue at that match would generate media attention. Would never happen though.

That’s what I’m hoping to do. I have my ST, hope to upgrade it to a premium membership.

Why shouldn’t season ticket holders, who are putting funds in to the club, not have an issue with people prepared to travel further to away games only funding our rivals, but say they will never set foot in St. Andrews. Until Man City at home in a cup match anyway.

Clarified that the deal offered would have required indemnifying Wasps against any and all potential costs, penalties and any financial risk relating to the purchase - now and in the future. Simply could not agree to that, could finish the club forever. Whilst it’s PR, if only they had been...

Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us.

How can anyone know? It could be a percentage of any future fee, the selling club will just build that in to the price.

Same impact on CCFC though - wasps occupy the Ricoh

If a takeover happened wasps wouldn’t be able to use any ongoing EC investigation or Sisu legals as an excuse. A takeover wouldn’t stop either, either.

They could have used any transfer income to offset debt. If they haven’t done that then they have chosen to invest in the team.

I am so sorry that I wasn’t clear. I was suggesting that the man deserves our support financially to enable him to continue to build a team to compete at the best level possible. I. E go to home games rather than, as many suggest, abstaining and only going away. Doing both is obviously the best...