Search results

To be fair to Nick, this started off as a 'might be signing Ched Evans' thread. It has now moved on to the degree of obnoxiousness of the guy. Does Nick move it? What if someone then posts another post about a further rumour of him signing for us? Does Nick then move it back again? With all the...

The latter I would guess. How on earth she has stood by him is beyond me. Even if he was found not guilty of rape, he is definitely guilty of behaving like an arrogant shit.

No we shouldn't. To my mind the only case he could have is if he could prove that she consented and she was happy bagging two footballers for the night.

Agree. Sounds like a lot of this new 'evidence' is witness statements. That does seem to hold much credence I would have thought. People do lie on behalf of others. He certainly needs something a bit more concrete, unless these witnesses are police officers, or people from the victim's side...

Agree with this too, but if someone found guilty does have further evidence, not heard in court, then he has a right to appeal. Hope this doesn't involve the victim back in court, but justice must be seen to be done. As it stands, justice was done and Evans rightly convicted. If he has new...

Totally agree with that.

To be fair, NW is usually a top, top poster.

'Ched Evans has successfully applied to have previously unavailable evidence examined by the Criminal Cases Review Commission.' I do believe he is allowed to do that and the CCRC have quite rightly decided to look at the previously unavailable evidence. Besides, if Hitler had been alive and...

Stupot, has anyone, anywhere on here said the verdict was wrong? Anyone at all?

It is indeed. How can you turn up for a day at a funfair and end up losing limbs? Is it speed and danger and profit over safety?

I don't know what her view is.

So, what is your point? It just seems I am not allowed to say some people who followed the case say there is cause for the conviction to be declared unsafe. I'm pretty sure it isn't just about what constitutes rape either by all accounts.

We need to sit down over a pint and I bet to a pound to a shilling we have exactly the same view on rape and what constitutes rape.

Do the Chuckle Brothers follow court cases as part of their job? NW, you are better than this. I'm not talking about any old Tom, Dick, or Harry. These are people who follow court cases as part of their jobs. This is getting totally ridiculous. And in case you are a little deaf, I BELIEVE HIM...

What's he been found guilty of? All I can reiterate is, the bloke was found guilty and I believe him to be guilty. Just some people who followed the case in court believe there is reason for the conviction to be unsafe. I didn't follow the case. Some people followed every day in court. Doesn't...

Yep. There are people who followed the case (journalists and media), who say they thought the conviction was unsafe. Apparently though you aren't supposed to mention that. Does make me laugh, cause I find I am having to defend myself even though I believe the bloke to be guilty. :D

To be fair though, Tony, he has submitted fresh 'evidence' and there will be a ruling with a few weeks or so. Then hopefully the whole thing can be put to bed once and for all. This article from yesterday. He has made a further grant for appeal...

As long as we get the players we need I am not bothered. No point moaning now and then in a couple of weeks we all suddenly go 'Oh, we have recruited well, that's alright then.' I am not worried yet. 2 weeks before the season and we still haven't recruited, then I will start to worry.

I have found on here you can't quote the defences case without being jumped up and down on, even though you don't at all believe the case yourself and are simply stating their defence. ;)

Never even had a one night stand, so I'm in the clear on this one.