Search results

Don't be ridiculous!!! He's 36.

Only we signed Lee Hughes before he committed his crime and he had left the City at least a year before the incident took place.

Yep agree. Exactly the sort of player we don't want here.

Yep. As I say, if there is any new evidence, let's hear it!! The bloke is guilty as charged and words are cheap.

This is why I hate written communication. :( If you could hear the intonation of what I was saying you would see I agree with you. I am only saying that SOME people seem to think the conviction is unsafe. SOME of these people appear to be people who have studied the case. That is why I have...

I agree. As I say, NW, this is NOT my view. To my mind he was found guilty and IS guilty. All I am saying is that some people seem to think the conviction is unsafe, nothing more.

Yeah. On here we only get inane babble!

David McGoldrick was at Notts Forest between 2009 and 2013, before he then came to us. Record at Forest was - 63 games, 8 goals. That is one is all but 1 goal in every 8 games. let alone 5. Just saying like.

GMK R.I.P. it up and start again.

Such as this. This is from a female journalist covering the case - 'Only the Ched Evans story is far more problematic than that of a priapic predator in a dark underpass. I’ve spent two grim days reading about everything the former Welsh international did in a hotel in Rhyl in 2011. I have come...

Well Astute, I am not at all showing any bias to Ched Evans at all and as far as I am concerned, he is a shit and I wouldn't want him here, but there are quite a few out there saying his conviction was unsafe. I am merely saying that notion is out there. I do not subscribe to that myself, but...

There's another 2 I thought of myself as well. A loaf of bread, but between each slice is a rasher of bacon, a sausage and a handful of beans. So, already packed into the loaf. You take 2 slices out and pop it into the toaster and 2 minutes later you have BREADFAST! Second one I am working on...

Dan, you know what's going to be big? Electrified water. Get on it while you can. Thank me later.

Stop talking sense you numpty! I can envision a 600 page rantathon looming. Fact is, he is guilty. No-one should touch him with a barge pole. I do think it is a bit presumptious though talking too much about if he overturns the convcition. I think we should just leave it that he is guilty and...

In full agreement on that last point.

Me neither.

stu, you misunderstand. I am talking about IF he proves his innocence to the rape conviction. I'm not talking about now. As it stands now, it would be very foolish for anyone to take him. If he clears his name though, clubs will then be lining up for him.

This is football and a business. I think a fair few clubs would be looking at him.

My eyesight may be failing me, but am I right in saying that something weird is growing out the bottom of that hat?

I had a feeling in the back of my mind that he had done, but wasn't sure. Now you have mentioned it, yep I recall, it didn't come across with much sincerity at all. I still wouldn't want him here even if he is innocent, but many clubs will want him if he clears his name of rape.