Search results

  1. M

    Judicial Review thread

    Yes. It was only supposed to temporary until CCFC used their option to buy the Higgs share. Higgs has to go and then CCFC and CCC will be together as ACL. This is the main problem caused by SISU not purchasing the Higgs share. City would still be at the Ricoh if they had of. SISU would be in a...
  2. M

    Judicial Review thread

    1. there was a unaminous full council vote 2. people's monies can be used to protect council's assets 3. an email from someone called Ann is not proof that it came from Anne Lucas 4. the council would be obliged to sell the asset to the highest bidder if it came to a sale. If they sold...
  3. M

    Judicial Review thread

    Did you get an email on this one, or similar, from M.L.? It is referring to the "conspiracy" between Higgs and CCC. Was it corrected by CT and, if so, how? and indeed why? The judge made it plain that Higgs was not involved in a conspiracy - therefore neither was CCC. CCC cannot conspire with...
  4. M

    Judicial Review thread

    Would love to, but live in a different country and have lots of work on. Still respect you for trying though.
  5. M

    Judicial Review thread

    3 weeks? (oops)
  6. M

    Judicial Review thread

    They can hardly nip over to the pub now. They could have done on the steps and asked the judge for an adjournment whilst they discussed the case together. Sorry, but this JR prevented any negotiations. Your pressure should have been applied to SISU first - drop the JR - and then to CCC - look...
  7. M

    Judicial Review thread

    You drew up your policy in 2013 - not too late then to drop the JR, if you were really interested in "fair" negotiations. An example with Northern Ireland. The republic dropped their claim to Northern Ireland territory in order to move forwards - a major gesture in order that people could have a...
  8. M

    Judicial Review thread

    Why has the article been corrected? It was true as it stood. Without ACL, any talk of a conspiracy was misplaced - as stated by the judge. CCC could not conspire with itself. How does the article now read? This is getting silly.
  9. M

    Judicial Review thread

    Yes. Ask SISU to drop the JR and the words "unemcumbered freehold" as a precondition of negotiations.
  10. M

    Judicial Review thread

    @ Nick: Was Mr Harris correct in thinking this? Or did Chris West well unterstand the implications of CCC buying the loan and therefore brief the councillors correctly? Even if Chris West didn't unterstand the implications, does this effect the legality of the loan? The question is "was the...
  11. M

    Judicial Review thread

    No. He says that claims that Higgs were involved in a conspiracy were misplaced. Without Higgs being involved there was no conspiracy - it takes at least two parties to conspire. So, in other words, the claims that CCC were in involved in a conspiracy with Higgs were misplaced as stated by the...
  12. M

    Judicial Review thread

    What is a victory in court? Being proved that the JR cost a fortune in legals, stopped us moving forwards, prevented CCC from offering negotiations without a court case looming over them, wasted charity time and money, involved council officers in senseless work and all for nothing? There is no...
  13. M

    Judicial Review thread

    Evidence deemed relevant by either party...... Says it all. The evidence that the judge deems relevant is what this case is all about. Assuming we have a gold mine of dirty washing, what does that mean in terms of getting CCFC back to Coventry? How does that help reconcile the parties? SISU...
  14. M

    wouldn't like Pressley's Job

    How many of the dozens of others have more fans following the Club at away games and per media at court cases than at home games?
  15. M

    wouldn't like Pressley's Job

    Who? Your new PA or Pressley?
  16. M

    Some You Win, Some You Lose

    You have a perverse train of thought. A subconcious desire?
  17. M

    Judicial Review thread

    If this mess carries on like this, you will have plenty of time to wonder. The best result at the JR would be "finality". Over and done with. It is a distraction and prevents us moving forwards.
  18. M

    Judicial Review thread

    I don't see how they can read out irrelevant "evidence" in court - whatever your point of view. If SISU have something, then it belongs in a different court on another day.
  19. M

    Judicial Review thread

    Are the emails etc. between ACL related parties relevant to the question as to the legality of the council's actions? The judge has already rejected reems of SISU "evidence". I don't see it. How do you know there are grounds for a civil action there and, if so, why not go ahead with a civil...
  20. M

    Bid for Wilson knocked back

    Difference being that I put it in perspective. I am still more concerned about the present and the future. SISU are in charge. They have had 7 years to do something. They realised the predicament about 2 years ago and are trying to do something about it - far too late and having made matters...
Top