Search results

Which is what they are trying to do with the threat of revocation. The FZ adult ticket was sold as “when accompanied by a child”. Perhaps holders of such tickets should either not have been admitted if on their own, or charged the difference. However, almost certainly impossible to implement -...

They shouldn’t be cheaper for the adult. The uproar last season was about the increased price of children’s tickets in standard and premium zones, not the Increase in adult prices. The Family Zone pricing was, in my view, an overreaction which has had unintended consequences through abuse and...

Given the way this is going, not refunding where games have been moved for TV or other causes really doesn’t seem reasonable. It seems to be a bit all one way, whilst the calculated and fraudulent abuse of the Family Zone pricing is not being addressed.

Last season Family Zone adult £250 - should be bought with one junior which could be £50, total £300. Standard adult early bird £400 Standard adult full price £480 and people were moaning about the over 65s concession prices!

There is no reason for an adult ticket in the family zone to be cheaper than an adult ticket in the standard zones.

The kids zone approach was so that potentially high priced tickets in premium zone wouldn’t be sold for peanuts to children. It was about maximising revenue from premium seats,

In the family zone?

Welcome to the 21st century😀

being devils advocate, how is money being thrown away when the seats have, in fact, been sold at the going rate. What is wrong is the fraudulent purchase of FZ tickets with no intention of child's ticket being used. That is down to barmy pricing.

Isn’t the real issue with empty seats in the Family Zone the non attendance of non existent kids, invented to get an adult a cheaper ticket and who will never attend because they don‘t exist? The adult FZ ticket was sold on the basis of the adult being accompanied b6 a child. It that never...

Won’t the turnstiles register that you haven’t attended?

Doug obviously wanted the stadium. There is probably some value in the intangible that is security if tenure. Frasers could shaft us all in a couple of years time.

TBH don’t know about the financial benefit of the club owning the stadium. You would have to think there must be some financial benefit though - else why did Frasers but it. They did pay, and Doug would also have only paid, peanuts for it though in reality, given the 999 year lease.

In relation to the stadium, if only Doug had arrived a few weeks earlier. in fairness, Frasers are improving lots of things.

That would be totally wrong if it doesn’t operate within the points system. Preferential treatment even within the points system sounds a bit iffy.

That’s is a very nice piece acknowledging Liam Kelly’s contribution to the clubs recent progress.

Most of the (imaginary) kids haven’t turned up.

I can’t see that happening. Too expensive and of no benefit to the TV companies

The agreement with Wasps was for 10 years, its 5 years with Frasers.

Our goalie made some good saves.