Search results

If there is a “certain point“ involved, then by definition it isn’t free speech.

I can’t say it.

I was going to put Offwiththeirheads, but realised that this could be viewed as an incitement to violence and not freedom of speech trying to be humorous (and no doubt failing). On that basis I won’t post it.

D Does it protect free speech? It doesn’t feel like it.

This is all getting a bit Salvador Dali.

The latter.

7 of them are deluded.

What??? As opposed to private helicopters???

I really don’t know why there is a fuss. Perhaps ask the families of beheaded victims.

Most of the recent TV programme was based on what is presented in this article. More and more commentators seem to be casting doubt on the safety of the verdict. I read recently that a review could take 5 years which is incredibly sad if true and if Letby is innocent.

We didn’t kick her out, she left the UK of her own accord.

Being a member of a proscribed terrorist group is my understanding,

Technically she hasn’t been kicked out, she left of her own accord and has been refused readmission. legally she isn’t a British citizen.

I’m sure you can see the link.

Can Any more excuses? Perhaps it started in the womb.

And yet Labour seems to want to give 16 year olds the vote.

Nearly old enough to vote in Labour’s opinion.

At the end of the day she supported a bunch of murdering bastards. Let her stay where she is and reap whatever the consequences of her actions may be.

How did she How did she conduct her legal business in the UK? At the time, as far as I have read, there would have been no legal basis for Bangladesh to have not confirmed her provisional citizenship.

You use the terms groomed / brainwashed when the correct term is radicalised.