Search results

Fadz. Not even close.

Thats fair and I totally get those concerns. Again I think the council would be fucking stupid to open themselves up to more Sisu lawsuits. I just also think Sisu haven’t played their strongest hand. They have fan support, they’re riding the crest of a wave with how the team is performing and...

Until there’s evidence to the contrary I’m just going off what’s been said. It was an outline proposal that didn’t go anywhere. As I’ve said before if Reeves thought it would go anywhere then he’s a fucking idiot because he’s been told by the people who have to sign off on the decision it...

According to the press release from ACL yes: “The Companies and the proposed administrators from FRP Advisory have run an accelerated sales process to sell the business and assets of the Companies and have identified a preferred bidder.”

Listen to the interview. 2:10 “the political administration of the council were very very clear there was to be no bailout, no funding directly into Wasps”

I don’t know enough about FFP rules TBH to know what’s counted and what’s not.

Because his bid was accepted and if it wasn’t the best then the administrators have failed in their legal duty and should be taken to court.

What’s your allegation here? That Reeves is lying about the stage the proposal got to? And about being told no bailout by the councillors?

No I’ve suggested that Sisu aren’t even at the table by their own choice. There’s no bid to reject. As a side point I’m saying as I’ve said for a decade that Sisu royally fucked up their relationship with a key stakeholder because they were badly advised by a bunch of political loons and have...

Except he wasn’t.

Ah yes, the old “why do you trust what literally everyone from the club itself to the administrators to Simon Gilbert and SaddlesBrains’ inside sources say and not this hypothetical situation I’ve invented because it makes me feel good?” I really don’t know mate.

It’s not. It’s down to whoever owns the arena. This again is all a distraction from the fact that the club has made no attempt to buy the arena and has repeatedly said it doesn’t want it. But people are asking why the council seems to support some bids over others and that’s the reason.

No it’s not. It’s pointing out how silly it is to complain a plaque saying why the arena was built doesn’t mention Wasps FFS

Explain. What material difference would “uniting the club and stadium” make? It’s just sentiment. It wouldn’t give us a bigger budget, and there’s no evidence we have the commercial chops to run it effectively. And again. Sisu haven’t even bid! You’re asking an asset holder (both administrator...

Wail and gnash all you like. The facts of the matter are those are what the freeholder wants and several people are offering it, but not Sisu.

It doesnt mention the 2-0 win over QPR either 🙄

Because that was what was needed to get it built. As NW said the requirement was added by Nellist at the vote stage. Other projects have a different history and this is ours. Why can’t our owners fund the club like other teams at this level? Because they’re other clubs.

Keep reading.

Its really not. Come on. Wasps promised to redevelop the land around the arena, a key council priority they keep mentioning. More importantly they promised a use for the bowl and outreach work. All that was new investment into the city. We know it didn’t happen, but that’s not the point. And...

But that was Sisu playing their hand badly as well. They went out of their way to piss off the owners of something they wanted, repeatedly said they didn’t want it, left it saying they’re never coming back and banked on there being no other major sports team available. Theyve approached it from...