Search results

No, you're still petty point scoring. People either call out the comments by Rayner and Johnson or you call out neither. People either call out the threats and made to Abbott and to Patel or you call out nether. But if you do call out one and not the other then you're just weaponising it for...

I can point out loads of examples of like for like comments about violence and sexuial violence that have been hilighted in.one case but ignored in another. There was a study which said the most abused MP is Dianne Abbot but how many people have criticised the threats made to her? Like I...

Definitely not. If it wasone up top I'd go Waghorn but I think he'll play two. But see the edit to my last post

Must bring back some bad memories for Ginola

I met him yesterday!

You not read that thread! Robins said ankle. Edit - just to be clear, Robins said it was his ankle, not that he wouldn't play Wednesday.

His ankle injury.

What's happening here? Has someone collapsed in the crowd?

This is the only example I'm going to put on here, but a Tory MP joked about sending a bomb to a Labour MP only two weeks ago and I don't think it's been mentioned, the hypocrisy is off the scale. You either say tone down the rhetoric and apply it to all sides or you don't. I think its time...

They're not joining a relegation battle

They had Lee Clark and another ex player on earlier and they asked them who they should sign. Their totally realistic targets were Coutinho and Modric

Don't think Vik will play

They've been wanking on about how great the atmosphere was going to be but it sounds quiet to me

Think it's fairly inevitable he will!

Haha! I Didn't know that. You might be right about the permission.

Should of let him go. Never seen the sense in keeping a want away player.

Didn't realise He was involved in that, I'd imagine he had to give permission for it to be used so fair play.

Brass eye?

Fair fucks to Steve Bruce, 1000 games. Great achievement.

What makes someone think this is a good idea?