Search results

Possibly. Of course my take is based on the assumption the residence in Kentish Town is his which it may not be. Though if it isn't that opens up a load more questions.

Did wonder if maybe his surgery was less security conscious than the London consituencies. And if that is the reason then a lot of planning and research went into this murder.

But if the house they're searching in Kentish Town is his residence why did he travel to Southend? There are Tory constituencies closer to him than there. Amess's voting record isn't particularly controversial, as far as middle Eastern policy I'd say its pretty much aligned with most tory mps.

I'm sure it will come out in the course of the investigation.

So did George Curtis and Dave Bennett. Cov win. Edit - I don't think Curtis carried on playing g but was sat up onthe stretcher smiling as he was carried off - Cov still win.

Also searching a property in Kentish Town. If that's where he lives then he's travelled quite a way and for some reason he's singled Amess out - but why? Seems really strange.

Plenty of people, including me, have criticised individual woman commentators on this and other threads and no one has pulled us up for it. That's different to making sweeping comments on all women commentators. Of course it may be your experience on other platforms or in actual conversations...

Agree. He's a decent fella but I think his time in the game is up.

And if there is enough audience who share your opinion he'll get another crack. But if there isnt then he may struggle, but its not cancelling him, which is my main point.

So it's either a boring PC answer or it slates women in the game? There is a middle ground. As I've said, if there's a broadcaster that wants to go down that route I'm sure they'll give him a gig.

But media outlets are totally entitled to say that's not what we want

But his were general comments on women commentators not individuals. And to be honest, if your trying to break into the media I wouldn't have thought singling out individual commentators or summarisers would be advisable no matter the gender of the commentator.

Made the samecomment last night after seeing pictures of their crowd on twitter. Seems unsustainable to me.

But you could say it, and people would disagree, and you could say it again, and people would disagree, but you're not working for a media outlet. If there's a media outlet covering sports that wants to kick back against women commentators then I'm sure they'll employ him and people who align...

Not one person has.

I like him but I'm coming to the conclusion our style of play doesn't suit him.

Same,I don't like her actually commentating because she struggles to convey excitement but her summarising of games and general reporting is good.

But he is free to express that opinion, and media outlets are free to say that's not the type of output we want. I'm sure the Daily Mail wouldn't employ Owen Jones and the same with the Guardian and Dan Hodges but that's not cancelling them. Both have ample outlets for expressing their opinions.

I like Alex Scott, I don't like the Brummie girl but it's her voice that grinds in the same way Michael Owens does.

No I didn't. But I suppose it depends what he said. I am uneasy with the way some stuff is dragged up from decades ago and used against people, JCH for example. But you also have to think about your target audience. GB News suspended a presenter for taking the knee. Was that cancel cultureor...