Search results

Not at all, I’m sure he was quoted saying that wouldn’t effect the relationship - not sure if that was further down the line. I Agree you can’t argue that this was a total shock to them, and given our owners history - it’s really to be expected.

Valid point, but it’s still a deal offered and one taken. Again I’m not sure, how culpable a buyer is in these situations, or in any transaction. I’ve been championing the complaint, if tax payer money needs to be recovered - then surely nobody can be against it? I struggle to see how you...

This is the problem with a lot of the fans - some would see the above, whilst some extreme on the other side would see CCFC die to give SISU a bloody nose. All in all - I can guarantee that if it all goes to pot, SISU will ride off into the sunset and in Coventry - nothing will happen to the...

Yeah the house buying/renting analogy in our situation is scratchy. But given that it was tenantless at the time, and being ran into the ground - is it possible that the value did drop? I know this is going to be a can of worms (arena wasn’t auctioned - hence the EC complaint) Take a 250k...

As I said, I think the house buying thing is tenuous at best - they did know the legal situation when they came in. It’s not as though wasps put a gun to the council’s head, ACL was losing value - we all know that. I’ll appeal to the other side and as I said above, if it was SISU and not...

I’m going to take a house analogy (I know we disagree with them), if you were offered a 250k house for 50k would you take it? That’s the sellers fault not the buyers Me personally would love it to happen, but like I said I’m trying to create a common ground here between all fans. We’ve got...

And change the seat colour to black and gold to be fair? Might help our players see each other better

Ok, I see the point about legals. SISU, will know the consequences. If it goes the way that SISU want, I’d be intrigued to see where SISU Go then, regarding getting out of the undertaking. But the flip side is - if it is tax payer money, shouldn’t The council be made to recoup tax payer...

No but the telegraph has always taken licence with semantics

Didn’t wasps take on the 14 million debt? That would be the 20 million. If it’s undervalued - it’ll be after a EC investigation and they won’t use a local rag as evidence

My friend lives is Moesley and said he’d go to a few games for a laugh on a Saturday and he supports Reading... hasn’t forgiven me for McNulty yet though

We’re all guilty of it, myself included we’ve all picked sides. Let’s try and lay the cards out and try and repair the fractured fan base. Right I think we can all agree on the following: 1) SISU -SISU came in rightly or wrongly in 2007. They stopped the club from going into administration...

I’m in, just pro CCFC songs though. Can’t be dealing with the inevitable in fighting that lol occur when you get some anti council people along with people there to applaud wasps fans and have a love in

Don’t want your council draining resources, but happy for them not to tender it out and sell to the highest bidder?

They should have gone into Administration before Leicester did - we had 60 million in debts - problem was Too Many powerful people were owed a significant portion. They weren’t prepared to write it off.

Make no mistake 5k will be success, I think we’ll have more sympathetic fans but if the club starts off badly it will tail off. We need a sixfields style start

Clearly @CJ_covblaze is ignored in the meetings, either that or he paints a different picture on here.

Ahh well. That’s that then. Onto the groundshare it is. Whoever’s At fault, it’s up to the fans to realise it’s them who keep the club alive. We’ve got to do our best to attract the fans to wherever it is.

They’ll probably ask the new owners to cover them

Wouldn’t the guarantee just be if it’s successful sisu wont pursue wasps? They surely can’t be asking for them to indemnify wasps if the council come calling?