Search results

Agree with some of that, but I think the present government is right wing ( which you don't think )and getting away with that because labour doesn't appeal to enough people, particulary those in the centre ( as you say ). Partly because of media attacks based on Corbyn's own mistakes.

Let's see shall we. We are in the position of having our story challenged. If we cannot prove anything, then we have lost a propaganda battle and Putin will continue pointing the finger at us. Maybe it will be in our interest to let them have a sample for checking. At least it shows a...

I don’t want. But we will probably have to give up some probes to be tested by Russia.

Then why are we giving evidence at an inquiry? Do you know something no one else does?

8 EU countries and our closest allies backed our actions. The rest of the world are keeping quiet. Corbyn is a privy councilor and has access to the same information and wants more proof. So for most of the world and the opposition leader it is not case closed.

More crap. You and Grendel are claiming that I said give up our sources. Which, of course, I didn’t. Maybe you should work for the Express? You’d fit in great.

I said that is the situation we are in. I didn’t say give up our source, but the demands for an inquiry put us in a sticky position. You are the one who invented that.

Either we give our sources or methods up, or we admit that we cannot prove anything.

Yes, of course I have. Putin will have also, which is why he demands an inquiry.

No, but I think that a dark clandestine organisation is behind Salisbury. Most probably to do with Russia with Putin‘s knowledge. I also think we seem to be having difficulties in proving it. I hope we have something to put on the table in answer to Russia‘s demands, otherwise this could be...

Highly probable, but how do you prove it? I don’t think they are stupid.

Yes that’s why I wrote „could potentially happen“.

I have no idea what we have, but your argument is the same as mine was before Iraq. It would make things a lot easier if we put something on the table and stop relying on „highly likely“.

It matters to our government and the people that support us and/ or are opposed to Russian dirty tricks.

It’s the other way round. Putin only has to say „prove it“. We made the accusation and it’s up to us to say why and offer proof. You should work for the tax office.

Of course they deserve answers. We have accused them and punished them. Even if they did it, which I agree is most likely, we still have to put something on the table. It would have been great if it were proven that the ingredients were indeed Russian. Now our scientists are saying they cannot...

Yes, well that is a possible explanation as the scientist that I heard said they can pinpoint the origin of the potassium element, and now another scientist says they cannot prove that it came from Russia. It means we have to have something else conclusive. Difficult if we don’t want to give...

„Russia’s embassy in London responded that Porton Down’s assessment “proves that all political declarations on the Russian origin of the crime are nothing but assumptions not stemming from objective facts or the course of the investigation”.“ An answer to this Russian statement would be a...

An expert scientist says we cannot pin it 100% on Russia. So, what do we have left as a massive weight of evidence?

So, you don’t want to answer my questions. Fair enough.