Search results

How has he breached security? Also, we have a democracy and the opposition is expected to hold the government to account. We are not at war with Russia and the situation is not as clear cut as you like to state. Maybe we were right. Putin is my chief suspect, but at the moment he can still point...

How has he used it? He says we need more information. Our scientists‘ says they cannot pinpoint Russia on their tests alone. If Corbyn doesn’t think the government have enough, how do you know who is right on that?

We have a known liar, a cheat in his love life, a man known for being tactless and non diplomatic, as chief diplomat of the UK. For me it is a bizarre situation. Even in an era where a dodgy real estate family with money laundering connections run the USA, and Russia is run as a cleptocracy by...

Interesting. What confidential information and how has he used it? Is the information that we don’t have proof and are just bluffing? If we have proof, is Corbyn lying by saying we need proof? How do you know about him using confidential information for his own benefit?

I mean right wing and I do know what right wing is. And I don’t know where Blairite comes into it and I don’t know what friends I am supposed to have according to Grendel’s post. I mentioned the countries backing Russia and the 17 abstentions in the recent vote about the inquiry. Which means...

To a degree, but Boris has been sacked for lying in the past and in this case he is making statements which go well beyond merely affecting the UK at home. That is very serious.

My friends? You don’t even know any of them. They are almost all pro EU and you probably wouldn’t get on with most. I do know some very right wing people though ( not really friends, just acquaintances). What have they got to do with Russians and the Salisbury inquiry anyway?

Yes, they did.. the vote was 15:6 with 17 abstentions. That is hardly unanimous. The Russia backers were: China, Azerbaijan, Sudan, Algeria and Iran backed the Russian motion, the diplomatic source said. Seventeen member states abstained

I’ve been working and had my evening meal...

No it wasn’t, they were outvoted. Iran, China etc wanted them involved.

I thought it was because our ambassador had been misquoted... all getting a bit muddy..

Did you see the verdict Grendel did?

What was The Hague verdict? Was Russia guilty? Or are you referring to the vote about whether Russia should be at the inquiry? I thought the results of the independent tests are coming next week. Could you post a link proving Russia guilty? BoJo is a known liar, so what he says doesn’t count.

Tony said he couldn’t

No, but you went off in a huff at the time. Can’t be arsed.

Which is why I agreed wit Tony who couldn’t read the whole article.

No.

Yes, because it is not the first time you have posted an article, which has a rabid headline and then further down it says something milder or even truthful.

I only know the „Nigel Farage is a wanker, is a wanker, is a wanker“ song.

As far as I know the organisation that has convened is only interested in nerve agents used in Salisbury. It is supposed to be impartial, so I doubt whether it will be looking into past cases.