Search results

Thats bollocks, we need to hammer this home. thte indemnity clause needs to be dropped

It’s pretty simple stuart - you know fuck all... you refuse to ask both parties the questions and take the first answers as gospel

Just come home - what’s been said

I mean like it just sort of happened, the problem for me was that it didn’t build onto the force awakens - Snoke was effectively a nothing character, although I feel it will make more sense after RoS based on snippets I’ve heard. I may look at the Last Jedi more favourably. It was kind of like...

I’m looking forward to it. I agree with you - half the online hate I don’t get. I’ve enjoyed all of the films. even Last Jedi - just thought nothing really happened. Definitely a filler film. Rogue one has been my favourite of the newer ones

In all fairness we could still lose our replay - Bristol Rovers v Birmingham is doubtful to have the same interest

Ah see I loved force awakens,last jedi I didn’t like as much as it seemed to just meander, like nothing really happened. I’m going to watch Rise of Skywalker this weekend

I’m not 100% sure but the underselling would be between wasps and the council, the losses incurred by SISU would be a separate issue altogether. I think SISU would then return to our courts with an EU judgement saying it was state aid and undersold not sure on that but that’s how i understand it

I’d imagine that ultimately the party seem to be in the wrong would be the seller for underselling - yes they’d recoup the money from wasps, but I’d imagine then SISU would sue for any losses they have incurred as a result of the underselling

I suppose as I said in the other thread - if there’s something wrong, then SISU should rightly be able to pursue the council. It would be more than unfair if they weren’t able to seek indemnity from the party in the wrong

As much as I’d love to see it - Wasps won’t get relegated, Rugby is stacked so the bigger teams don’t get relegated

See that’s where I think SISu have been sneaky - they’ve agreed to stop legals against wasps. wasps got wind and for some reason want to stop proceedings full stop. I don’t get why wasps need to defend the council

I gather they’re happy not to pursue wasps - it’ll be the council they go after if the EC finds something wrong. Something they’re not willing to give up

Love how the telegraph refer to the indemnity clause as “a so called indemnity clause”

Lionel Bird is off his rocker. I spoke to him a few times - he’s just bitter he lost his share of the club

You only have to look at the wasps protest - the sky blues trust did a last minute announcement of it before immediately distancing themselves from it. they effectively said it’s a load of crap, but it’s pro CCFC so we’ve been pressured to announce it but yeah - 2bf it’s worth a try. It’s...

Nick doesn’t have the power though - if sky blues talk ever got into the media, CWR will be first to rubbish it and the trust will be wheeled out to say it’s a load of bollocks from extreme Coventry fans with links to SISU

Yeah, that’s where the disagreements come in. It’s their contacts I’ve emailed FSA for complaints procedure but received nothing. the copy and paste tweet section is a start - like I said, wouldn’t have been in the paper 6 months ago

I agree. Shmeees view in my eyes is too simplistic. But he’s effectively give up on the trust for the same reasons you’re saying. we’ve got to continue the CWR offensive. And whoever tagged Stephen Vaughan in Neils comments about the wall was a good idea. We need to forceably engage the...

2bf @shmmeee isnt defending the trust - he’s basically said try and get on board or stop moaning. Whilst I get his point, I don’t agree it’s that simple. It’s not as proven by nicks offer to help He’s said multiple times they’re not fit for purpose.