Problem is that they want increased fan involvement, but all they’re doing is pushing against the owners - if anything they’re moving further and further away from fan involvement
lol so now the indemnity is public, they’re just going to accept it’s not happening so now they’re chasing other avenues to avoid the criticism of wasps
To be honest I actually agree as long as they reform. They need a new membership platform where we pay annually.
More modern voting and meeting procedures and hopefully we can move forward and get everybody working to the same end
The problem is, for the trust to work they’ve got to change from a rabid SISU OUT protest group to actually working for the betterment of the club.
there’s too many egos on the board for that to happen currently
So we’ve basically broke the trust? What this comes from is pure arrogance to think they can push any agenda they want.
What we’re seeing now is the loss of control from the trust - Neil is responding more and looking weaker and weaker.
they need to just disband now, or even start again
That’s not our problem as you’ve pointed out. We’ve just got to get the club back to Coventry and moving forward.
of course if we can get the clause dropped A SISU better not bollock it up
To be honest, I emailed Duggins and they’ve effectively washed their hands of it. Going forward the council aren’t players in this.
it’s a deal between 2 private companies
Are we to understand that this was the trust/Wasps conversation -
Trust: “why the need for the indemnity clause?”
Wasps: that’s commercially sensitive
Trust: ah - no worries, SISU DROP THE LEGALS!!!
It’s the same as a lot of fans with effort/talent. They see strikers as goals. His link up play with king was class. When he left he was on course for 20 goals in a crap side. I was gutted when he left