Search results

Isnt the deadline a bit pointless though? They Initially said that we could return at anytime. Surely this is a bit sensationalist?

Telegraph tweeting articles “Coventry fans not happy with Wasps Ricoh decision” first time I’ve seen it Levelled at them

To be honest If that was the case the media would be the first to investigate and shut it down. If SISU are lying there’s usually a 5 page speead

They seem to be the ones breaching - I’d imagine they’d be happy for it to be dropped. or they could be lying and lying and it could be a bluff - who knows

No they won’t. But at least without an NDA we’ll see who’s taking the piss and who’s lying - one says there’s an indemnity clause the other says not. we need to know whos lying.

Got to be trolling... I tried looking for something back in 07 - SISU were the councils preferred buyers of the club

I don’t see how SISU are on the front foot? Someone is clearly lying here. It wouldn’t surprise me if it was SISU. I emailed the Coventry NW MP last night. It’s time we scrapped the NDAs and got them both around a table with an independent mediator. I don’t trust politicians at local level, so...

Really gutted about this. We’ve always took SISU at their word on this indemnity. there’s no reason to use semantics on it this time. its the first time Wasps acknowledged it. Dress it up as legals or complaint -it’s the same fucking thing. stop this stupid NDA shit and get around the table...

The good thing is - Wasps are trending... it’s not favourable. Their PR team will be in overdrive tonight

then following a secret meeting with a Eastwood changed his tune completely

I assume our friends at PsB person is fuming and can’t understand why we think his best mate nick Eastwood has put the indemnity clause in?

Anybody else looking forward to the inevitable meltdown next season when Conor Chaplin runs riot against us?

Then that idea supports a stadium for our fan base. If you want to go and watch us play the Chelsea’s... then go and watch us against Rochdale. It helps maintain the average

Sunderland have history of 35k to 40k crowds - justifies their stadium. we rarely get over 18k... hence the reason for an 18-20k stadium

right since we were relegated what was our average attendance? there was a new stadium bounce, but there’s no point rattling around in an empty stadium. 20k is good - possibly 22k. Review at the end of each season? we’re grossly overestimating our support, in one of our most important games in...

the good thing about modular stadiums is that it can be increased quickly if we sell out more often then not we can add 2k or so. you didn’t see Bournemouth thinkingc fuck it - we’re not ambitious enough... better get a 50,000 seater

You can’t build a stadium on the basis of “we might get a big draw and loads more will turn up” you build it to demand. we’ve rarely averaged over 20k -if that starts to fill up regularly and we start to have waiting lists - you expand. You want the experience to be the best for your regulars -...

I’d imagine “future damages” are any damages required to be paid to the council. they wouldn’t be asking SISU to underwrite damages per se because the only party who could claim any sort of damage would be SISU. They signed not to do that. I think it’s a case of semantics

The club did say that. Wasps have so far refused to mention or acknowledge the indemnity clause. They’ve stuck behind the vague “legals.” One can only assume that it wouldn’t look good for them - what with them being PR conscious obviously the state aid complaint didn’t include remedies or they...

I’m sure the undertaking referred to all future legals agaisnt Wasps. initially the undertaking was enough. So one has to feel that wasps were ok with it. I assume the indemnity came in to cover the state aid potential losses. they want us to sign that indemnity - I think their use of “future...