Search results

You don't seem to have much of a clue on how to run a business. Alienating your customer base isn't a particularly great means of generating revenue.

Why would they be keen when they haven't been keen for a decade. Aston Martin is the same, as is Severn Trent. Stadium sponsors and partners aren't going to take up a massive % of the boxes. At most it'll be 15-20% of the stadium total.

Local businesses are a huge benefactor the club's income. Who else you think purchases these boxes?

Boxes are nice inside but yeah it's appalling that you don't have outside seating. It's the same at Forest.

Why would they have 4/5? Jaguar don't associate themselves with the club from my knowledge. CBS will likely have some granted. You're looking at 5/6 taken at most by the above.

Matchday Boxes | Birmingham City Football Club To use an example of a similar sized club but the demographic is entirely different these are Birmingham City's prices for their hospitality boxes. Essentially it looks like we've set our prices roughly the same as their most exclusive box or to...

But the target audience isn't the same, so that calls more for further consultation given we have few corporate partners and the vast majority are SMEs. No one is saying this. You're pushing this narrative because your point is idiotic. As stated I would've been 'happy' to have paid 40% above...

It's a pretty obvious concept. If you're going to dramatically increase your prices consult your customers first that this is happening and what roughly it will be. If you get a severe pushback it's probably wise to reassess your price position. The notion some are suggesting is idiotic. You...

Because it would've given the club a semi-accurate steer of the furthest they can push a price increase.

Genius. So some box holders pay full whack and others have them half price later on in the summer because the club can't sell them.

Well they won't.

Well obviously. Thanks for pointing that out. I've said before I'd be more than happy to have paid an extra 30-40%. What they've done is ridiculous.

The club is likely losing at least 75% of its box holders. From the 10 I know including me, 1 is renewing. It's not about benefitting from a cheap box it's about the club increasing the prices incrementally to ensure they've got customers to sell the boxes to. Almost tripling their price is...

Price increase is very annoying. I've supported the club for many years as has my family and this is a less than positive way of showing appreciation. It's astonishing why we weren't consulted beforehand but that's neither hardly surprising as they treat us with utter contempt anyway. DK is...

I'd imagine it's a case of he claimed the club was debt free with the honourable intention of it being paid off. But I'm inclined to think DK would've waited to pay that off upon conclusion of a big sale given it's not due until next summer from memory.

I find it difficult to believe the club will be reinvesting more than a quarter of Vik's fee back into the playing squad. As mentioned there's Brighton's sell on to account for, operational and infrastructural costs to cover and the EFL loan to repay. If Hamer is also sold then I'd like to...

The biggest gap the club are going to have to fill is the hike in rent. Judging by some of the comments from those within the club I'd imagine it is extortionate and the commercial deal - i.e. F&B/parking etc. is somewhere in between of less than great to practically non-existent.

Sporting's record transfer stands at €16m. They were never going to offer much higher than the bid they've just submitted.

You're clearly an idiot.

It's not a case of quality over quantity. There are gaps to be filled which desperately need filling. Not sure how you aren't grasping this. Your notion that Robins will bring in 3 CBs for instance is insane. That would leave one as cover in the event of an injury.