Search results

There's not enough difference to appeal to me with this clown in charge. And I've voted for every Labour leader in my life time at least once, from Kinnock through to Blair, through to Miiband and Corbyn.

So do you think that course of action is in line with his statement on workers rights and Labour's relationship with the unions? And would I want a PM on a picket line, no. Would I want the LOTO throwing his weight behind the working man when there's a cost of living crisis, eye watering rises...

He banned front benchers from attending picket lines but allowed Lammy to go on TV spouting shite. And the problem isn't that he isn't left wing enough, the problem is he's an untrustworthy liar. There's no point in me saying the tories are untrustworthy liars we need them, so I'm going to vote...

He told front benchers not to attend picket lines. And I know you'll say you've got to play the game but he didn't warn front benchers not to trash strikers or BA workers who were trying get pay reinstated. And the Mail ran a story saying he secretly supported the strikes so the right wing...

What's changed to make a Labour leader go from supporting workers rights to not supporting workers rights in just over a year? Oh yeah, covid. How many times have we heard the tories trying to use covid as an excuse when it's clearly been bollocks?

These are the sort of mental gymnastics we all call the tories out for.

I'll ask again, if the way forward is to distance himself from policies like renationalisation and workers rights, why include them in his mission statement soon after becoming leader?

So why was Starmer banging its drum when he became leader? What makes you think Labour will be any better on climate than the tories?

Its not even just about money anymore. The French intend to buy up the last bit of EDF even though up until now its been costly. They've been prompted to do this by the war in Ukraine. Countries need to have as much control over their own energy supplies as possible

Why bother taking it down, he'll probably do another 180 at some point.

So youre suggesting Starmer needs to distance himself from Corbyn policy, and the way to do that is to commit to renationalisation when he became leader and then do a u turn just over a year later, ditto his about turn on unions and workers rights?

What's this got to do with Corbyn? When Starmer issued his ten pledges they were all over it, now its a bad idea, its hilarious. It really is like a cult. Nothing to do with whether they like a policy, all about which way starmer tells them the winds blowing.

The centrists are on a real anti renationalisation drive since Keith did his u turn, absolutely embarrassing. They really are red tories.

The problem is some of them are so emotionally fragile they can't even deal with the rejection of getting banned from an Internet football forum

Hiding behind the pandemic, what a wanker

Whoever becomes PM is going to be presented with the plan for a NHS recruited drive to fill the 12k staff shortage. How is Truss going to fund that if she scraps the NI rise? She's also said EU climate laws are going. I'm no fan of Sunak but he'd be my preference but I think he's blown it.

True to some extent, but letting her speak has to be a better look than keep interrupting her, Sunak has not covered himself in glory here.

The amount of gaffes she makes your probably better off letting her speak

That's how I'm reading it. Though Liz Truss showing she has no idea what the term 'on the never, never' means.

Get off here and get back to work then! Seriously, well done.