Search results

Good news again from SISU camp. Oh dear should I say that? ;)

You don't need permission. What's more important to you? Your disabled friend or SISU?

You are also forgetting the so called 'offer' was not just a 150k rent. It involved a 10 year agreement and other clauses that made it ridiculous, though on face value it grabbed headlines for the 150k rent only deal. Hmmm. Legally ACL did not offer the deal to the company that could accept...

Ok we all make grammatical errors as our brains typically run ahead of our typing fingers and we end up with typos all too often. - Perfectly understandable. It's the use of TO instead of TOO, OF instead of OFF and such like that is most annoying tbf. I don't claim to be the best as I lived...

How about the one we were supposed to get in Richardson's vision, sliding pitch, closing roof and all?

YES! Finally the penny drops. It's not the argument at fault here just the 'fact' in the statement by Linnell. The fact is , as you have correctly now agreed, he was right! Stupid I know but my point was always about the fact being undeniable. Thanks for proving it.

We have started well. Shame about 10 points deducted but regardless of that there is great hope at the moment we could still make the playoffs. Why not? We have Clarke and Wilson up front and a strong midfield group. Who are the teams that will fall away from early form and which ones will...

would we be 4 points off the top and 5th had it not been for the -10?

Yes it is! For goodness sake, listen to yourself? You pay tax as you say and yes while you don't get to decide how it's spent, you are effectively paying indirectly to where ever that money goes? The key was 'indirectly'.

You are right but I already said it was both pedantic and a rubbish point? My view here is just to make the point that it is indirectly giving money to Otium and that is all. It's not saying I'm taking sides just looking at fact and the principal in the argument Mr Linnell was talking about as...

It's a very poor point and frankly not worth the mention but surely it is true if Sky pay money out to league clubs and then add live match day money to that pot directly to CCFC to broadcast the live game which in turn you are watching on TV, then your subscription however indirectly, is giving...

Well he's being a bit pedantic about it but it's never the less a fact that can't be denied especially if you are on the NOPM side and are so set in your belief.

Don't get me wrong I'm pleased as punch but I sensed a slight struggle to get the ball in the net today if I'm honest. It was not all about Wilson today and Clarkes finishing was weak from what I heard? Just a worry that's all...but wins do give confidence.

Why did we find it so hard to get the winner I have to ask? Has some of the gloss (Wilson and co) gone off our game plan? I hope not. I really want to put it down to a tough kind of opposition set up. But we will face plenty of that type of tactic throughout the season.

can we be careful please?

finally!..................

Good grief what do we have to do?

Surely we can do enough to get a winner in the last 10 mins?

Frustrating describes this game. Where is our free flowing attacking style gone? It sounds like we are not quite pulling things off today against a poor side?

So we score first minute, they come back at us while we congratulate ourselves and as ever our shaky defence lets one in. We then proceed to dominate and all but score a few and somehow we are level at half time. Is that about right?