Search results

I hear he may be available for on a free or nominal fee (like McG, he's out of contract this summer).

A line has to be drawn and goals (over the line or not?) and offsides should be sorted out first. E.g. In rugby, the TMO don't tell the ref if it was offside or not etc.

The proposal for goal line tech (i read) is a sensor in the ball, which will make a sound in the refs earpiece if it goes over, doesn't interrupt play at all as he'll hear the noise, give the goal. Offsides I don't think are on the table, that'll be left to human error

Another thing giving me (fools) hope is Reading last year, 15th until Jan (21 or so points off 1st) and they win it quite easily in the end. I think we have a good enough team for top 6 min, doesn't mean we'll get there though.

If I were given the money to sign either, McG. But the hread's question was who was better for CCFC. In that case, it would be MK.

If you look at what I said, a review or challenge system would be best implemented for goals (after they have been scored/not scored). For example, Cov score a goal, but it is ruled offside, we challenge, the incidence gets looked at, decision is made. Or Cov concede, we suspect offside, we...

Well, it isn't going to be perfect is it? On the point about spin bowlers, if is a LBW, regardless of how marginal it is, is out. On challenges in tennis, they would take the mick if they had unlimited challenges, 3 is about right, and remember, if their challenge is correct, it doesn't...

That might be covered in 50% share deal, I don't know. 250k is wishful thinking, but it is possible if we're that desperate, or SISU are for that matter as they may see him as the man to get us promoted. Again, for some reason, I have 250k as a figure in my head because rid it came down to...

For offsides etc. it'll be hard to implement, maybe a challenge system? (if you score, ruled offside, you challenge, or vice versa) I'm not a techy so it'll be up to them. For a goal that has supposed to have gone in, if the sensor is in the ball, it'll go off/make a sound in the ref's ear...

I think, weirdly, we might be willing to pay more (250k ish) because of his importance to us whereas a championship team may think it's a risk and not offer that much. In short, we might pay over the odds. I hope so anyway.

Regardless, the system works and has made cricket better. Football should follow suit.

That's basically what I meant.