Search results

CRFC are smart enough to withstand pressure from CCC, as the alternative of letting to SISU (would on past experience) surely lead to years of litigation for one reason or another.

Wasn't it reported that CRFC were interested in converting the pitch into a 4g one? If so, what are the EFL rules on the level we would be allowed to use such a facility.

It depends on whether public opinion regarding CCFC is reflected in local elections, so far there is no evidence that it has had any impact. Both Labour and Conservatives were in favour of selling the councils stake in the Ricoh to Wasps. Secondly, if public opinion was a factor in elections...

True, but the people dealing with this are business men and women, who don't give a stuff about public feelings unless it hits their outcomes and profits. The council negated their responsibilities in this matter when they sold their stake in the Ricoh, so have no contractual responsibilities in...

The risk for us is that Wasps are due a windfall of cash from selling an element of their rights in the Premiership, so in the short term they are able to play "hard ball" with us. Our situation is far weaker - we have a few weeks to sort out a venue.

I'm not sure if any of the parties are taking any notice of the fans

Good point - don't worry our owners will sue them!

I heard that the Sheff Wednesday owner was trying to sell the club, so it's plausible that in the interim he'll reduce the costs of running it.

For whatever reasons it wasn't working out here for him. Positive move to cut the losses and move him on.

Are they rebranding in connection to a new major sponsor?

We have other young players that we're developing. I can't understand why we would want to sign him, especially as it looks like he's unlikely to be match fit or he would be better than the existing players.

Agree - there is a question that as a Director of the company ....is he acting in the "best interests" of that company?

Spot on! If Otium folds, then the assets [none] are distributed to creditors & there is nothing for a Supporters Trust.

He's a Director and he has statutory responsibilities, along with legal control over the business. Keep up with the law!

At companies house Tim Fisher is listed as a person of "significant interest" in the companies operating CCFC. Therefore, as you've stated - he does have control over the legal process. Grendal thinks he has no control....if that's the case then the submission to companies house is false and...

In that case the submission to Companies House is totally inaccurate, which is against the law!

If Fisher is really serious about ensuring CCFC's future at the Ricoh Arena in the long term, then his role as a Director of the companies pursuing litigation is key. Under the "Confirmation Statement" lodged with Companies House persons are always cited as being a person with "significant...

Agree - As Tim Fisher is a Director of the companies that is initiating legal action, then he is conflicted [at best] or a total hypocrite in his comments in yesterdays programme.

Best to avoid signing Ireland - he's got more bling than talent & he'll only annoy Doyle!

Jimmy Hill followed by John Sillet they both created a positive culture within the club