Search results

By now I would expect the sites to be at least known to us, possibly purchased, and plans available for us to see. We're nowhere near that. In fact we're not very far on from where we were when Fisher said months ago at the fans forums that we'd have all the info in a couple of weeks.

I did wonder if there were roughly 6 month milestones that SISU had to report back to the FL on. We got the drawing about 6 months in, was that for their benefit to buy some more time?

In all seriousness discounting the councils who have already been approached how many miles outside of Cov are we talking for the next closest? Didn't somewhere get specified as the point the distance was measured from (the council house maybe)?

This could be a very interesting meeting! Surely SISU are going to have to try and put some sort of statement out before this meeting given what's been revealed in the last couple of days. How long can they keep the pretence up. They need to either get on with the new stadium or come clean...

Not sure you can even count Nuneaton and Bedworth as the first one. They aren't in any sort of talks or negociations with them. They had an initial enquiry and have heard nothing since.

Have you got any quote since Ann Lucas has been in charge categorically stating they will not sell the Ricoh as all the quotes I've seen say the opposite.

Have you got a link to these plans then as no one else has seen them. Even if you had started the JR before 'moving on' why would you keep pursuing it if you have no interest in the stadium anymore, it makes no sense to be spending out on legal fees for no reason. If they are that concerned...

So make an offer! If they think the council won't accept a serious offer then put one in and call their bluff. They might get a bit more support from the fans if they can show they've made an effort to do anything. At the moment they're refusing to talk to the council or ACL and aren't aren't in...

So why don't they get on with it then? We're over 6 months into a 3 year plan and so far all we've got is a picture which looks suspiciously like the stadium Brentford rejected (designed by the same chap) with the seat colour changed and a meeting to talk about the colour of the curtains.

But they haven't walked away, that's the problem. They said they've moved on but what is the point of the JR if they've moved on? Why are they mentioning 100 year leases if they've moved on?

To be clear I was not saying I blame SISU 100%, I was making a conslusion from someone elses statement. Saying that forget what's happened in the past and look at the present. There's no point people banging on about Richardson or what Mutton said when he was leader of the council. At present...

This isn't like the fan forums where they're basically doing the same thing 3 times. This is an event for ST holders only with a vague promise that at some point in the future there might be another event for everyone else. I understand that on some things ST holders should get priority but on...

The whole 'we can't say where it is' thing has never stacked up to me. I've never heard of a football club planning to build a ground and not telling anyone where they're thinking of. I could list of various sites Pompey, Southampton and Brighton have been interested in. If people can name...

I'm sure you're just reading too much into the fact that absolutly no details have been released about the meeting for non season ticket holders!!

Well ACL and CCC are both clearly happy to do business with SISU so you can then only draw one conclusion and that is to place blame with SISU. In the grown up world when you have disputes with people you draw a line under them and move on. SISU seem incapable of doing this, if they could there...

I just had a look on there. It's quite sad how excited they all are about the CT article last night and how it's proof that SISU really are building a stadium.

Quite right, it shouldn't be down to ACL to chase SISU to make them buy the share back. We had a right to buy back 50% of ACL (and I belive that deal included CCFC getting all matchday revenues), it was believed to be a cost of around £10m. SISU put in a much lower offer to Higgs which was...

ACL have made at least one offer to SISU that included access to all of ACLs share of matchday revenues and arranging meetings with Compass to discuss access to their share of matchday revenues. This offer was dismissed out of hand by SISU. Why should ACL hand over renveues on non matchdays...

You might not of said that but Fisher and Labovich both did. We know, at best, they have spoken to one council about a new ground and it was a tentative enquiry which has not been followed up on. How does that tie up with Fisher and Labovich saying they were in talks with two councils about a...

"Since that initial exploratory contact we have received no further approach and we are therefore not considering any proposal for any particular location."