Search results

35 minutes would be an good time for everyone to leave.

For me not so much about giving him shit but if every game (and more than once a game) asked him the same reasonable questions that he should be able to answer what is he going to do? He'll have to refuse to answer as unlike on CWR he can't get them to quickly move onto the next question. He...

SISU clearly couldn't care less what we think so to a certain extent anything anyone does is pointless. Our only option really is things that will get press, especially at a national level. While I don't think any single protest will be the thing that changes everything keeping SISU in the...

As with everything it depends what it's being changed to and more importantly if the fans were in favour. If a clear majority of fans wanted us to change to Coventry Phoenix for example then it should be allowed but if SISU just decide one day they want to change it then no way. Same for kit...

Pretty sure it's the same person, you didn't think there was actually 3 protesters at Sixfields did you?!?

Looking at those pictures it does seem like it might be true that he has a couple of stewards to make sure nobody has a pop at him. Have to say the thing that frustrates me the most about those who attend Sixfields is the way the vast majority seem to have just rolled over and accepted the...

Maybe so but if you go back say 10 years and look at all the teams who have been promoted is it more common for teams with bigger or smaller playing budgets to achieve promotion?

125 of them must have been packed into that corner of the stand you can't see!

You have to wonder if the turmoil at the club is going to impact on the ability to sign even academy players. If they're good and have offers from elsewhere do we look a good proposition these days. I guess the plus for signing would be you'd probably get in the first team before too long!

I suspect (total guesswork to be fair!) that SISUs stance was if you don't let us play at Sixfields you'll have to kick us out of the league and if you kick us out of the league we will take legal action. Wouldn't matter about the golden share then. If they would have done it or not, or whatever...

Think it was Leeds who were threatening legal action against a points deduction for admin but were told if they were taking legal action the FL wouldn't issue the share to them. Not sure what would happen if clubs who already have a share started legal action. Anyway there could be a lot of...

We'd all like to know all the facts but we know that CCC have been advised not to make any comment before the JR, given they are 50% owners of ACL it wouldn't be a huge stretch to imagine they have at least passed along that advice to ACL and / or Higgs. Labovich knows this and knows there is...

Didn't the trust give the FL a load of information which the league claimed they had never received despite the trust having proof they had?

I'm not sure if they aren't all putting up a front of being totally incompetent. To employ one buffoon you could say was bad luck but to keep repeatedly employing them and then taking no action when they embarrass your company over and over again seems very strange. If it is just general...

When he was on CWR talking about the accounts I can only recall him mentioning a forum with Brookfield to cover detailed financial questions about the accounts. Even if at some point he has mentioned another forum to cover a different topic its clear that he made the offer to discuss the...

Or they knew sending it to so many people would make it pretty inevitable that it would get it.

Here you go shmmeee

Not living locally I've never been to a meeting but I've been asked to vote several times. I believe they were also looking at finding a way those who couldn't make the meetings could access them online, webcast or something similar.

If that's the case shouldn't that be a letter to the Trust, not a letter to individual members behind the back of those mentioned?

How are they unrepresentative? Anyone can join, attend a meeting and point their point over. As I understand it those on the SBT board were elected to their positions. That seems pretty fair to me. Not sure how you get from Labovich sending the email to blaming the trust. We don't know who...