Search results

Unfortunately, or fortunately depending how you look at it, Fisher isn't the one calling the shots and Sepalla said she was only interested in the freehold and even then only if the freehold was unencumbered! My preference was for CCC to retain the freehold with SISU buying ACL and getting an...

Wasn't passing comment, just answering your question asking for articles that suggest anything other than 100% control for Wasps! To be honest I have no idea if we have a chance of getting 50% or not. When the council did the deal it seemed we had been stitched up. Then there was the suggestion...

Probably because they kept saying they weren't interested in a lease!

Didn't you used to be able to buy them from a couple of places in town (Transport Museum and tourist information I think)? Has that been scrapped. If they're not going to have a shop they should at least have somewhere for people to buy tickets.

Best possible news for us if there's anything to that. It would now be clear what SISU need to pay and I don't think anyone has argued Wasps are paying over the odds, if anything people are saying the opposite. if the Wasps deal collapses SISU can just step in with an identical offer. There's...

Would like to be optimistic but I fear we are going to get a hammering from someone soon and it could be coming this weekend. If they get one or two early goals we all know we aren't going to mount a comeback, wouldn't be surprised if they put 4 or 5 past us to be honest. Maybe we're in for a...

Can someone bring me up to speed. I stopped reading all the threads on ACL / CCC / Wasps etc as it just seemed to be the same old argument going round in a circle but when the idea of SISU buying 50% of ACL was mentioned just after the sale to Wasps the general consensus seemed to be it was BS...

Well done all round. Hopefully they won't bring back the matchday increase until we get to a point where we're filling the place and you can push people to buying in advance - if that day ever comes!

The club should setup a system like QPR have for these games. Can't be that hard, just sign up on youtube and it was only 1 camera feed.

That's my point, they are using a term that most people probably don't come across very often and trying to make it sound like something it isn't. They are saying cash flow positive as if its a shining example of how well they are running the club but it doesn't really mean that at all.

You know that when they are so careful to say cash flow positive rather than something like no debt or making a profit they are trying to pull a fast one. Of course they're cash flow positive, the wage budget has been cut again based on being at Sixfields and now we're back at the Ricoh selling...

All those Villa fans can't wait until we move a bit closer so they can stop supporting Villa in the Prem and come and watch us instead! This is where the franchising argument falls down in football. Where are you going to move someone to? Sure if Man Utd decided to move to Brum they would get...

To me that just shows had bad they are at running everything. Only a month after sorting a 4 year contract it turns out that's not what they need and they want another year. What's happened in the last month that's delayed fantasty land by a year?

I get the idea of protecting the players and not constantly having a go at them in public but sometimes you need to do it. We've just picked up 1 point from 6 playing 2 poor, out of form, teams. He should be saying it as it is, that its totally unacceptable and what he's going to do about it...

1 point in 5 games is certainly relegation form. The last 2 games should have been a guaranteed 6 points, even with a slip up at worst 4 points. To have only got 1 point is simply unacceptable. This has all the hallmarks of the championship relegation season. Let better players go and replaced...

The comeback is on!