Search results

Chihuahua.

EU to the rescue. So long as you live in the part of the UK that we left in the single market https://m.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/ni-coca-cola-production-saved-from-uk-co2-crisis-by-protocol-40873699.html Why can’t we all (as Michael Gove put) have the best of both worlds.

I wonder if this might have helped https://amp.theguardian.com/business/2017/jun/20/uk-gas-storage-prices-rough-british-gas-centrica?__twitter_impression=true

We also knocked then premier league Stoke out of FA Cup while in league 2. Plenty to cheer about that season. Unless you’re Mark Hughes.

Okay, I’m going to say this. IF MY CHILDREN HAVE TO GET VACCINATED ITS ON MORONS LIKE YOU.

I’ll take that as a no then. So basically 3 discredited scientists that fly in the face of convention with unverified, un peer tested opinions not based on actual facts trump hundreds if not thousands of scientists, many of who are actual experts in the relevant fields, many of whom will have...

So bello. So far you have named 3 cranks that share discredited opinions that fly in the face of peer proven fact. Anything else?

Made that point. The rest of the team that won it with him also don’t share his opinion having listened to peer proven evidence.

The guy has nothing of substance. All he has is a misunderstood opinion that falls down with a minuscule amount of questioning. He’s absolutely a crank and you really don’t have to look into his opinions very hard to understand that.

Pharma science is science. The clue is in the title.

Like I said. The rest of the team that won that prize don’t share his opinion. Weight of numbers tell you he’s wrong.

That’s the same Michael Levitt. One thing of note, he won the Nobel prize as part of a team. The others don’t share his view. If you’re using his prize to legitimise his in peer tested opinion then you have to apply the same logic to the others who won it with him, then the sensible thing to do...

You should discredit wherever you you read this from simply for the fact that claims he’s a director of Pfizer. He isn’t. If they can’t even get a basic like that correct why would you entertain believing it.

So you already know he’s a crank yet you still chose to believe him.

Complete bollocks. His opinion based on nothing that’s never been peer tested against a tsunami of evidence to the contrary from almost every virologist in the world that has been peer tested. Why do you choose to believe one discredited crank against the entire peer tested medical profession...

Just to add. If your grandchildren do end up having it that’s on you. You have the opportunity to get the vaccine meaning you are helping the country reach herd immunity and your grandchildren won’t have to have it. If you want to protect your grandchildren from not only Covid but also getting...

Media? You think I listen to the media. I do read the peer proven evidence and because I’ve got a mate with your mentality who likes to ring me and tell the latest conspiracy theory as to why I shouldn’t have got the vaccine and why he’s right to not get it I’ve very easily dismissed most if not...

Sounds like we’re going to front larger companies that pay big dividends every year to take on the clients of smaller companies that go bump. Socialism for the elite again, tax rises for the workers.

Try telling that to the families that have lost loved ones and those that continue to lose loved ones. There is zero evidence to not get the jab and mounting evidence to get it, unless you can’t have it for medical reasons. It’s not just to protect you it’s to protect everyone around you, many...

Windrush. The scandal that keeps giving. Seriously, how difficult would it have been to put this to bed for good if not months ago maybe years ago. Just pay them the compensation, that simple.