Search results

I think he’s probably our best man to man defender and one of the best CBs on the ball. People here just don’t like the way he runs and went with it. He’s been playing in probably the most disorganised defence I’ve seen in years.

I assume you mean different interested clubs here and not Sheff Utd raiding half our squad.

I’m saying he’s better than “worse player ever!” “Shouldn’t even be L1!” “Wouldn’t get in any other team at this level” and still my favourite “Wouldn’t get in a Russell Martin team”.

I think it’s madness to waste a season and the last of our cash on it tbh. I don’t see why you’d throw money at a manager in the hope he’ll become a better manager. It might have worked. Him sat watching sky sports for a year might have made him some elite tactician, but clearly it hasn’t.

Nust did the usual politician thing of answering something else and refusing to say what his policy would be just “we have to be able to talk about this stuff”

I mean him starting games (prior to a game when we were clearly trying everyone we haven’t tried before the window) and then moving to a higher placed team would be facts not opinions.

I can accept the argument we needed a motivator and a tactician and Robins and his new team wasn’t that, I think he’d have turned it around but I can accept that. What I can’t accept is that given that Lampard is the answer.

If he’s not the guy he’s not the guy. Time won’t change that.

Its only a joke, but yeah I do think Lati is better than the shit he gets here and he keeps proving that.

With teams that had spent a lot and were expected to be there. In Chelsea’s case they finished higher before and after him, it wasn’t an achievement.

My issue with Lampard is he’s never overachieved wherever he’s been he’s done about what you’d expect if not slightly worse. And he’s spent a lot to do that. We aren’t a rich club, we need a manager who can get more than the sum of our parts and not just be a figurehead.

One that goes like this 📈 and not like this 📉

Wait I can guess Malcs answer: is it lower your taxes?

That wasn’t the main reason. Action mostly wasn’t taken because of a combination of attitudes to underage sex, police corruption, and attitudes to working class girls. There was a small amount of wokeness from some, but without the other things this would never have happened. I’ll ask again: OK...

Any actual football manager with a record and yes. Though as it was a Doug King vanity hire he should front the cost.

The best thing would be to never have hired him, the next best thing is to sack him yes. I am not Jesus though.

80% of them were. Probably 95-99% were men. 1/4 of all people are Muslim, it’s not a useful category to target, to use machine learning terminology (look it up) the accuracy might be good but the precision is fucking awful. This is the problem all the way through. OK it was Muslim Grooming...

Put this in off topic (and then I’ll tell you why it’s bollocks)

This is just paranoid nonsense and not an excuse to drive government policy. There are people who think 5G causes Covid, we don’t need an inquiry into it. All this stuff was covered in the Jay Inquiry.

So you keep saying yet his career proves you wrong. Elite academy > PO chasing side > PO chasing side > top champ side.