Search results

The suggestion from SBZ was that Lucas and Sepalla could have discussed the sale of ACL with Lucas dismissing it out of hand. You stated this was not possible as it would have to have gone between the full council. You're now saying that only a formal offer would have to go before the full council.

Sambou posted about young players getting a chance against a big team like Arsenal, obviously referring to Rashford.

How is it clutching at straws? Are you seriously going to say every conversation that takes place about the disposal of any council asset goes before the full council?

Yes it is, if the assertion is that any offer made by SISU would have to be put before the full council then you need to define at what point any talks become an offer.

Would the same apply to an offer not formally submitted? For example if Joy said to Ann we want ACL for £5m and Ann told her no chance does that count as an offer?

Shocking result :whistle: Not sure how anyone can read the councils code of conduct and not come to the conclusion that it has been breached. Two of the main things are honesty and openness and we've had neither of them for a start!

Couple of them on twitter seem to be itching for a go in the first team. Any of them ready and worth a run out?

Lets get Jose in and see just how special he is :D

We need a point from this as a minimum. Hope we see a big reaction from the players, if we don't then I'm not sure what the solution is. We don't have the depth in the squad to make wholesale changes.

If you assume what Mowbray has said since him leaving is true then I would say no to him coming back.

I've chanted SISU out, I didn't do it because the team was playing badly, i did it as I did, and still do, want SISU gone. The difference is I am not under a code of conduct which states:

At the start of the season mid table would have been acceptable to me but having been top of the league a fall out of the play offs would be a huge disappointment. I can accept the idea that all teams have bad runs but ours shows little sign of ending. When we finished playing teams at the top...

Why do you equate people wanting honesty and accountability from the council to people wanting SISU to remain as owners? The simple fact is that the council's actions have placed us in a situation where SISU are likely to stay as owners for much longer than if they had obtained stadium...

There is not one scrap of evidence that says selling to Wasps was the only outcome possible. There is simply no way that could ever be asserted as ACL wasn't placed for sale on the open market. I have consistently said what should have happened was an open, honest and transparent sales process...

And it's the councils code of conduct. One requirement is honesty. How can they claim they have abided by that when it is known as fact that they consistently put out false information? Another is openness, can anyone say that has been applied surrounding Wasps takeover? They are required to...

The difference is CCC are a publicly accountable body who should abide by certain codes of conduct. The same can't be said of SISU, their only requirement is not to break the law.

Nothing to see here! Apparently the only reason they weren't made available is that it takes so long for the council to get anything scanned! Someone's been dispatched to go and make photocopies for those in attendance.

Because I was listing who was on the panel, Sloan is not on the panel. I didn't list SISU's lawyers, or the council's PR people who are in attendance either and will no doubt be involved.

Nothing to do with what Joy does or doesn't want. There are many unanswered questions surrounding the sale of ACL to Wasps. An independent enquiry would give everyone, on both 'sides', a clear picture of exactly what happened and bring to light any wrongdoing in the process. What possible reason...