Search results

Don't think so. Think it is 90 mins. Maybe Nick can confirm that, but if we had an overall winner we could not have a draw really could we?

Not too worried if the defence is a bit leaky, we have more than enough ballers in our squad to do well.

I see on the SBT Bookies no-one at all had the draw. A few pennies lost there for everyone.

Is he playing then today?

Yeah, exactly. I wasn't moaning, I was just advocating taking one game at a time and on paper, Japan look the easier opposition.

They don't half pee about with it, especially when they are in front. They should do a City and attack, attack, attack and go to kill the game off!

I think you will find I have always maintained that we have a decent chance of winning the whole thing. And at no point have I ever said we would be going out. Never, ever said it.

I have to say I do like this ref. Takes no nonsense and seems to be able to maintain control at all times.

It is. I think if Spain score again first now it will be all over. While it stays at 1-1 Russia have a chance of nicking it. You have to think that if Russia score, Spain can still come back from that, but I can't see the Russians doing so again if they go behind once more.

Or at least give you their very finest biscuits and bring out the Lapsang Souchong.

They really need to start clamping down on all this gamesmanship at penalties. Players trying to put the penalty taker off, walking in and out the area, walking up to the ball on the spot and then away again. Need to start giving out yellows. Once that ball is on the spot no player other than...

I think you'll find it's called a Glorious Defeat stance.

Stupid in the extreme. Would have been a penalty if it hadn't have been a goal.

I prefer the term 'footies' myself.

Errrm...crying? Seriously?? And when did I say we would be going out? All I said was Japan was the easier game and we could well find Colombia tough. 10 out 10 though for some crazily wild exaggeration.

No, because I tend to do that sort of thing DOWNSTAIRS!

So true and I should have thought about that when I hired Cassidy, Earp and Kid to do mine.

Exactly! It's a Theresa May/David Cameron style truth.

Yes they are, can't you read? They are the exact, same lines word for word. Except those tiny little bits. Why do you have to be so nit-picky? Does it really matter if it's Ned instead of Clancy and that the kangaroo is really an 11 year old Asian boy who walks with a spring in his step? I...