Search results

Two I think.

Seems to be a fair bit of opposition early on. Will be tough going to get enough votes.

According to KC on twitter today the only condition was that the whole deal was looked at by someone independent.

He's retired after 4 years at Man City. Has never got on the pitch and has only made the bench 3 times. His wages while he was there - £1.4m.

Seems like a PR job from ACL to me. If you remember at the time Fisher said he was not allowed to reveal any details of the revenue share. Looked great for ACL but now a couple of years down the line we find out its £75K.

The ethics committee was an absolute joke. The JR is just looking at the legalities at a particular point in time. Even then things that come out in the JR that show CCC in a bad light are quickly skipped over.

But that deal isn't available now so there is no option but to look at alternatives.

Don't listen to what he says about him on the podcast then!

Like how it goes on about what someone not even employed by the club anymore said in 2013 rather than concentrating on what Anderson has said.

Can't really see the point of expanding the league and having less revenue per club when so many teams are struggling financially. If anything you want less teams. Nobody in their right mind would come up with anything like the structure we have now if they were starting from scratch.

The Scots won't have an olympic GB team as they think it will lead to UEFA and FIFA forcing a GB national team so I can't see them signing up to this.

Because that's exactly the same thing isn't it? This is someone who on a day to day basis works with the highest ranking people at the club. Of course he knows things others don't.

And this has led to KC giving some detail of the conditions. Seems all it was just an independent entity to look over the deal to ensure everything was above board. He's also said the rejection they got from Higgs was a 2 line letter with no explanation at all for the rejection.

Wasn't there claims that the salary cap was being ignored and the RFU wasn't taking action? They've even hated in Australia: http://www.foxsports.com.au/rugby/michael-cheika-criticises-london-wasps-over-their-handling-of-signing-kurtley-beale-from-waratahs/news-story/69da5dd6d35fe43607cf623e88026168

Look on twitter. You've got one person who is in a position where they would have seen what was happening saying one thing happened and the local paper basically jumping up and down saying no it didn't. He's stated he has documents showing it to be true. Same response from the paper.

He's the communications guy but he deals directly with Mowbray, Fisher, Anderson etc so likely has a good idea what is going on.

But is the same standard being applied to everyone or just when its a story that would put CCFC in a positive light?

I find this attitude frustrating. Do they apply this criteria to every negative story they run about the football club? He did similar yesterday saying Reid was wrong about the Butts when he first published it as someone at CRFC had denied it, if Fisher denies something they don't just accept it.

Posted a while back a load of posts I found on a rugby forum when I was looking for some details on Wasps history. It was all people saying we would be up in arms and wouldn't stand for it and that the locals wouldn't go to games. The city is a laughing stock for the way we have welcomed them...

Best part of todays play was getting a tweet read out on TMS