Search results

That's exactly the problem. You'll never get a total boycott so it won't gain any attention any further than the local area. Certainly not to the point of making SISU take notice. Said it before, the only way SISU are going is if they are presented with a viable exit strategy.

And they'd just paid for a new pitch at Sixfields!

They do indeed play in Coventry now but that wasn't the question.

And for how many years since 1866 were they not playing either in London, or a temporary home close to London?

Just having a look at these. If you hand the car back at the end of the 3 years, assuming you're OK on mileage and damage, do you just get a new car for a similar monthly payment? Seems a decent deal if you want a new car every 3 years.

Maybe this is the news they're trying to bury :D

I got that reply when I asked Simon if the Telegraph could campaign to save the academy. Apparently its down to the fans not the paper to lead a campaign.

That's the key. If we'd moved and 'done a Leicester', and of course didn't have Wasps logos plastered everywhere, we'd love the place. Its the memories of the good times people miss, just they associate them with HR.

Did anyone watch this. It was appalling, how on earth it ever made it to air is beyond me. Clearly made with an agenda but despite their best efforts couldn't come up with any actual evidence to support their claims. By what I am sure is complete coincidence there was also an anti-corbyn piece...

So you really think when Kieran left the club there was an agreement for him to put out false information for 3.5 months after which he could then openly say anything he wanted?

yes but we're not talking about him being gagged are we. we're talking about him making statements after he has left the club. he didn't have to say anything and if he couldn't contractually why is he now?

Reading between the lines on twitter it sounds like the Telegraph may have been banned from the club.

I can't see why he would make shit up. But then I didn't think there was a reason for him to make up things about the two potential stadium sites he was talking about after he had left the club. I agree, but in that scenario wouldn't you expect him to say he won't deal with SISU at all? Not...

So lets say year 1 needs £500K put in for the club just to survive. Where does that come from? I'd be up for fan ownership and I'd happily buy shares but I struggle to see how it can work with our financial situation.

Also there's a big danger in getting people to stop going. They might not ever return.

The club isn't self sufficient, under fan ownership how would the losses be covered. Lets say you have a situation like last season where SISU had to put money in to keep the club going and the recouped some of it by selling Maddision leaving the rest in as a rolling credit facility. Where would...

Hard to argue with anything in that piece but the question remains who would be interested in buying? If the CT know of someone then they should come out and say so. Don't think it will have the slightest impact on SISU, they will keep doing what they want to do. How did you know? Interesting...

This is the thing for me. Is great having all these weird and wonderful formations when you've got players like Messi at your disposal but this is L1. Keep it simple.

But its a very specific thing. If he said I don't want the rugby club getting involved with SISU given what their history I don't think anyone would have raised an eyebrow but it was specifically stopping legal action against the council. Why would doing that make all his concerns for CRFC...

Which then raises the question of course as to why Millerchip was insistent on legal action that has nothing to do with him ceased.