Search results

Absolute shambles. After the new manager bounce wore off we've seen some pretty poor performances. Think we need to start looking at who to bring in as Venus doesn't seem to be the solution and if he's not I'd like the incoming manager in a few weeks before the window opens so he's not doing...

Balls, need to get a grip on this or we could get a thumping.

Doesn't sound like we've made a promising start

Just meant that someone could come in not being bothered about Wasps but with the endgame of CCFC owning the stadium.

Looks like they're ready just in case

Presume Rose is injured to not even make the bench. Edit: slight groin strain apparently.

An hugely unlikely scenario but could you do this legally in theory? Buy Wasps, which would come with ACL. Buy CCFC. Put them all in the same group of companies. Sell or liquidate Wasps. CCFC end up with ownership of the Ricoh.

It is indeed. Its also worth nothing that RB have said they will only go ahead with that sort of project if it is shown to be sustainable so its not just a vanity think that could leave them in a mess down the line, the numbers have to stack up. If they were to take us over they wouldn't be...

Robert or Lewis?

Yep go for it.

Red Bull took over SSV Markranstädt in 2009, they've done pretty well since then 2009/10 Oberliga Nordost (5th tier) - 1st by 22 points with a +57 goal difference 2010/11 Regionalliga - 4th 2011/12 Regionalliga - 3rd 2012/13 Regionalliga - 1st and promoted via play off 2013/14 3 Liga - 2nd and...

Really? So in the unlikely event that SISU have found an Abramovich type who will fund the club back to the PL you wouldn't be interested?

Would that be the one Nick started a thread on that I was one of only 3 people to comment on?

Not sure why a couple of people on here are so desperate to defend the CT. They clearly have an agenda. This was one throwaway comment not the proverbial 'smoking gun', if you want that look more to their point blank refusal to feature the legacy fund. What app are you referring to? The BBC...

The independent tax policy centre ran the numbers of the two candidates. Trumps plans $6.2 trillion in tax cuts with 47% of all cuts in 2017 going to the top 1%. That compares to Clinton’s plans which would have increased taxes by $1.4 trillion 92% of the increase in 2017 extracted from the 1%...

Oddly its a FL rule that you have to produce a programme.

How have the BBC screwed up? All the data was presented correctly by them as far as I can see. The full data was presented on the website and their tool for a graphical representation shows the programme at £3 against a division average of £2.92.

Presumably that means no pay on the gate as they'll need to check everyone in the ticket office. Does that mean a delayed kick off is on the cards.