Search results

Too right, I am. I'm doing my bit and missing out while Michael and his merry men still go despite the Trust bullshit of "urging fans not to go to Northampton". Wished I'd thrown my £1 down the drain now.

So how many are going to see Northampton's second team at Vale next week? Not many, I would imagine.

Similar to claims that standing on the hill is protesting. That is clearly nonsense too, isn't it Michael?

coventry city 2 1 gillingham

And so starts Operation Discredit Les Reed

I absolutely do support KCIC and oppose SISU as if I didn't I wouldn't be missing out on my first season - home and away since 1972. I'd be at Sixfields, not sat at home listening to the game on the radio. At first I did support the idea of protesting on the hill as it seemed a good idea from...

Just wondered.

Why do the "protesters" move at half-time? Surely not to see the goal we're attacking?

Agree with all you've said there. I just get annoyed when people say the rent has only been a recent problem. It hasn't. It was a problem four months after playing our first ever game at the Ricoh.

Warm by the radio.

This is an absolute lie which you and others keep peddling as truth. We moved into the Ricoh in August 2005 and we tried to renegotiate the rent in December 2005. Well before SISU were here. Even in the halcyon days of the new Arena with large crowds the Club knew the rent was excessive and...

Pleasant chap. Sent from my Galaxy S4 using Tapatalk 2

This is the front

I stuck the CD up on here a while ago, here's the link. It's the CD Tommy is talking about: https://mega.co.nz/#!fNpUyYbA!U_n7An1FiS_Mf2cjpGgNAgjrAUM0e1LQpBdUnptADTM Edit: I can scan the cover if you're interested, but it's a bit rubbish.

I guess it highlights what other authorities have done to help out their football team in council owned stadia.

Has it? I've not heard about that. When did that all happen? Well, stand on the approaches to the stadium then. What about that? Oh forgot, they wouldn't be able to see the pitch if they "protested" there, would they? EDIT: Got it. They can't protest in the bowl by the turnstiles. Plenty...

SISU victims? No, of course not. They have set their own disastrous course. However, everything is linked. If we hadn't have "aspired" then we would probably still be in a stadium we owned outright and not in Northampton.

Ha! I love how people forgive Richardson for selling our ground, earning massive wages (second only to the Premier League chief), relegating us, etc because he "aspired".

Both regimes are as bad as each other. One sold our home, the other moved us away from the City.

So if it's all about protest then stand outside the stadium. Surely, that would have more impact?